Return-Path: From: Marcel Holtmann To: BlueZ users In-Reply-To: <79be12f70708171422h6321e538hd92ea920068ea237@mail.gmail.com> References: <79be12f70708171418i44648442g45dbff593b84063@mail.gmail.com> <79be12f70708171422h6321e538hd92ea920068ea237@mail.gmail.com> Date: Sat, 18 Aug 2007 14:50:12 +0200 Message-Id: <1187441413.11068.15.camel@violet> Mime-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [Bluez-users] Fwd: hcitool scan problem Reply-To: BlueZ users List-Id: BlueZ users List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Sender: bluez-users-bounces@lists.sourceforge.net Errors-To: bluez-users-bounces@lists.sourceforge.net Hi John, > I am having a problem with the hcitool scan command (v3.13) using the > 2.6.21 kernel, as well as 2.6.23. Here is my output: > > Scanning ... > 3A:5E:11:6B:00:00 n/a > 38:C1:5E:35:3F:D9 n/a > C5:2B:F4:F7:3C:6A n/a > 3A:75:F9:65:1A:02 n/a. > 38:C1:60:35:1A:F6 n/a > > All of the addresses are partially junk for some reason - for example > 38:C1:60:35:1A:F6 should be 00:16:38:C1:60:35, and no name are > returned. This seems to effect other tools as well, for example if I > do try to do a hidd search I can't detect anything even if there are > discoverable hid devices around - I'm guessing because it doesn't have > valid addresses. Previously I had been using the 2.6.10 kernel and > everything worked fine. run "hcidump -X -V" and compare the output. Regards Marcel ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Still grepping through log files to find problems? Stop. Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser. Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> http://get.splunk.com/ _______________________________________________ Bluez-users mailing list Bluez-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bluez-users