Return-Path: Message-ID: <3e9cdced0805190124x1fced786h16c3475cf76a4a80@mail.gmail.com> Date: Mon, 19 May 2008 10:24:41 +0200 From: "Fritz Code" To: bluez-users@lists.sourceforge.net MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: [Bluez-users] using bluez without the dbus-daemon, just dbus-lib as peer-to-peer connection Reply-To: BlueZ users List-Id: BlueZ users List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============0692599228==" Sender: bluez-users-bounces@lists.sourceforge.net Errors-To: bluez-users-bounces@lists.sourceforge.net --===============0692599228== Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_4858_32495731.1211185481356" ------=_Part_4858_32495731.1211185481356 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Hi, dbus can be used in two modes, on the one hand just the dbus library in order to establish a point-to-point communication between two processes, on the other hand with the dbus-daemon which uses the library in order to allow the communication of many different processes with each other. In my specific scenario I have to safe system resources since I'm developing for an embedded arm system and I only have one single application which has to communicate with bluez. Is it possible to use bluez only with the dbuslib (without dbus-daemon) in order to establish a point-to-point communication between bluez and an application which uses the bluez/bluetooth features? If yes which part of bluez is responsible for doing that? Are there any differences in the view of bluez-functionalities between this two modes of communication besides the obvious that there can be only one peer-to-peer connection? thanks a lot. -- Regards, --Codefritz ------=_Part_4858_32495731.1211185481356 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Hi,

dbus can be used in two modes, on the one hand just the dbus library in order to establish a point-to-point communication between two processes,
on the other hand with the dbus-daemon which uses the library in order to allow the communication of many different processes with each other.

In my specific scenario I have to safe system resources since I'm developing for an embedded arm system and I only have one single application which has to communicate with bluez.

Is it possible to use bluez only with the dbuslib (without dbus-daemon) in order to establish a point-to-point communication between bluez and an application which uses the bluez/bluetooth features?
If yes which part of bluez is responsible for doing that?
Are there any differences in the view of bluez-functionalities between this two modes of communication besides the obvious that there can be only one peer-to-peer connection?

thanks a lot.

--
Regards,
--Codefritz



------=_Part_4858_32495731.1211185481356-- --===============0692599228== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ --===============0692599228== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ Bluez-users mailing list Bluez-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bluez-users --===============0692599228==--