Return-Path: <cyrus@holtmann.org>
Date: Sun, 18 May 2008 05:05:50 -0400
From: jayjwa <jayjwa@atr2.ath.cx>
To: BlueZ users <bluez-users@lists.sourceforge.net>
In-Reply-To: <482C233C.5060808@powercraft.nl>
Message-ID: <alpine.LNX.1.00.0805180455510.25212@nge2.ngu.pk>
References: <482C233C.5060808@powercraft.nl>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: Re: [Bluez-users] Nokia BH-801 why??
Reply-To: BlueZ users <bluez-users@lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Id: BlueZ users <bluez-users.lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bluez-users>,
	<mailto:bluez-users-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_name=bluez-users>
List-Post: <mailto:bluez-users@lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Help: <mailto:bluez-users-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bluez-users>,
	<mailto:bluez-users-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Sender: bluez-users-bounces@lists.sourceforge.net
Errors-To: bluez-users-bounces@lists.sourceforge.net



On Thu, 15 May 2008, Jelle de Jong wrote:

-> So got an other new headset with the hope it would work...
-> 
-> The nokia website sad it was bluetooth 2.0 instead of the 1.0 headset i first
-> tried. But I does not work... Can somebody please enlight me why?

sudo hcitool info 00:53:53:FB:7E:9C
Requesting information ...
     BD Address:  00:53:53:FB:7E:9C
     Device Name: Nokia BH-801
     LMP Version: 2.0 (0x3) LMP Subversion: 0x212b
     Manufacturer: Broadcom Corporation (15)
     Features: 0xbc 0xfe 0x8f 0x7e 0x18 0x18 0x00 0x80
         <encryption> <slot offset> <timing accuracy> <role switch>
         <sniff mode> <RSSI> <channel quality> <SCO link> <HV2 packets>

Still looks like a plain SCO                 ^^^^^^^

         <HV3 packets> <u-law log> <A-law log> <CVSD> <paging scheme>
         <power control> <transparent SCO> <broadcast encrypt>
         <EDR ACL 2 Mbps> <EDR ACL 3 Mbps> <enhanced iscan>
         <interlaced iscan> <interlaced pscan> <inquiry with RSSI>
         <AFH cap. slave> <AFH class. slave> <AFH cap. master>
         <AFH class. master> <extended features>



May 15 13:39:57 debian-eeepc hcid[8991]: Badly formated or unrecognized 
command: AT+CCWA=1
May 15 13:39:57 debian-eeepc hcid[8991]: Badly formated or unrecognized 
command: AT+COPS=3,0
May 15 13:39:57 debian-eeepc kernel: hci_scodata_packet: hci0 SCO packet for 
unknown connection
handle 1
May 15 13:39:57 debian-eeepc last message repeated 2 times
May 15 13:39:57 debian-eeepc hcid[8991]: Badly formated or unrecognized 
command: AT+CMEE=1
May 15 13:39:57 debian-eeepc kernel: hci_scodata_packet: hci0 SCO packet for 
unknown connection
handle 1
May 15 13:40:28 debian-eeepc last message repeated 10190 times



The error messages also look like those when eSCO gets sent to a SCO only 
device. Maybe it's possible for bluetooth 2.0 devices to still be SCO-only? I 
don't know the qualifications ...




-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft 
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. 
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/
_______________________________________________
Bluez-users mailing list
Bluez-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bluez-users