Hi All !
I recently ported Openswan on ARM cortex based SOC running linux
2.6.37 (ipsec netkey stack) and openswan 2.6.23. On this board I have
H/W accelerator support for AES/DES/SHA.
(http://processors.wiki.ti.com/index.php/Installing_AM387x_C6A814x_DM814x_Crypto_Support).
AES/DES crypto operation are working fine and I am able to ping
through IPsec tunnel from my board to PC and vice versa. However when
I am trying ping with SHA-MD5 I am not able to ping to and from
Ubuntu machine .
My ubuntu machine details:
root@vnl-desktop:~# uname -a
Linux vnl-desktop 2.6.32-33-generic #72-Ubuntu SMP Fri Jul 29 21:08:37
UTC 2011 i686 GNU/Linux
MYost probably it could be a IPsec configuration issue on Ubuntu
machine but I am not able to locate what configuration could affect
behavior of only one crypto algorithm. Since I am using same
configuration for IPsec for testing all Crypto algo supported in H/W
(DES/AES/SHA-MD5 )and I am successfully able to ping through IPSec
tunnel for DES and AES.
Just wondering if any one came across any such issue before. Do we
have separate config for SHA-MD5?
Appreciate any help /pointer reagrading this issue.
-SP
On Fri, 2 Mar 2012, satpal parmar wrote:
>
> I recently ported Openswan on ARM cortex based SOC running linux
> 2.6.37 (ipsec netkey stack) and openswan 2.6.23. On this board I have
> H/W accelerator support for AES/DES/SHA.
> (http://processors.wiki.ti.com/index.php/Installing_AM387x_C6A814x_DM814x_Crypto_Support).
> AES/DES crypto operation are working fine and I am able to ping
> through IPsec tunnel from my board to PC and vice versa.
Did you need to patch anything for openswan? Can you share your patches
with us?
> However when
> I am trying ping with SHA-MD5 I am not able to ping to and from
> Ubuntu machine .
> My ubuntu machine details:
> root@vnl-desktop:~# uname -a
> Linux vnl-desktop 2.6.32-33-generic #72-Ubuntu SMP Fri Jul 29 21:08:37
> UTC 2011 i686 GNU/Linux
>
> MYost probably it could be a IPsec configuration issue on Ubuntu
> machine but I am not able to locate what configuration could affect
> behavior of only one crypto algorithm. Since I am using same
> configuration for IPsec for testing all Crypto algo supported in H/W
> (DES/AES/SHA-MD5 )and I am successfully able to ping through IPSec
> tunnel for DES and AES.
I am not sure what you mean when you bundle "sha-md5" and "des and aes".
A tunnel needs both an encryption algorithm (aes or 3des) and an
authentication algothim (sha1, sha2, md5, etc). So for your tunnel
to work, you would always be using either md5 or sha? Since you say
some tunnels work, those algorithms must be working?
I am not sure I understand exacly what works and what does not work.
Paul
_______________________________________________
[email protected]
https://lists.openswan.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Micropayments: https://flattr.com/thing/38387/IPsec-for-Linux-made-easy
Building and Integrating Virtual Private Networks with Openswan:
http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/1904811256/104-3099591-2946327?n=283155
Hi there! Have you found any kernel error messages in /var/log/kern.log
or similar? I heard rumor of a recent mv_cesa issues. What's lsmod say?
On Fri, 2012-03-02 at 16:11 +0530, satpal parmar wrote:
> Hi All !
>
> I recently ported Openswan on ARM cortex based SOC running linux
> 2.6.37 (ipsec netkey stack) and openswan 2.6.23. On this board I have
> H/W accelerator support for AES/DES/SHA.
> (http://processors.wiki.ti.com/index.php/Installing_AM387x_C6A814x_DM814x_Crypto_Support).
> AES/DES crypto operation are working fine and I am able to ping
> through IPsec tunnel from my board to PC and vice versa. However when
> I am trying ping with SHA-MD5 I am not able to ping to and from
> Ubuntu machine .
>
> My ubuntu machine details:
> root@vnl-desktop:~# uname -a
> Linux vnl-desktop 2.6.32-33-generic #72-Ubuntu SMP Fri Jul 29 21:08:37
> UTC 2011 i686 GNU/Linux
>
> MYost probably it could be a IPsec configuration issue on Ubuntu
> machine but I am not able to locate what configuration could affect
> behavior of only one crypto algorithm. Since I am using same
> configuration for IPsec for testing all Crypto algo supported in H/W
> (DES/AES/SHA-MD5 )and I am successfully able to ping through IPSec
> tunnel for DES and AES.
>
> Just wondering if any one came across any such issue before. Do we
> have separate config for SHA-MD5?
>
> Appreciate any help /pointer reagrading this issue.
>
> -SP
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-crypto" in
> the body of a message to [email protected]
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Sorry for that confusion Paul. Yes you are right we need both an
encryption algorithm and and authentication algorithm for IPsec to
work. As per my understanding we can do this either in H/W through
some security engine or accelerators or through s/w libraries already
supported in Linux. IPsec stack will first look for H/W support and
if it fails it will fall back to s/w libraries.
On my SOC we have H/W support for AES/DES/SHA-MD5 with driver support
from TI. So when I say ping works with AES/DES I mean I see ESP
packets going and received both side in wireshark when I ping board to
PC(Ubuntu) or vice versa. So from above understanding I assume what is
happening is encryption is handled by AES/DES hardware and
authentication is been done in S/W. (Is there any better way to
confirm other then wireshark ?)
But when I include SHA-MD5 h/w driver support this arrangement fail to
work. I do see ESP packets going from board and Ubuntu side but none
of the sides are able to receive/handle these esp packets. This
configuration /ping works fine when I connect another board in place
of Ubuntu on other side . It's a strange behavior I am trying to
debug.
I think David can help us in understanding this situation better?
@David: Hello David! Hope you are doing fine. I am back to bug you
again! Please have a look at this mail and let me know if my
explanation of behavior is consistent with your understanding of
IPsec.
Thanks for your response everyone. I will update if I make any
progress on this issue.
-SP
On Fri, Mar 2, 2012 at 7:27 PM, Paul Wouters <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Fri, 2 Mar 2012, satpal parmar wrote:
>
>>
>> I recently ported Openswan on ARM cortex based SOC running linux
>> 2.6.37 (ipsec netkey stack) and openswan 2.6.23. On this board I have
>> H/W accelerator support for AES/DES/SHA.
>>
>> (http://processors.wiki.ti.com/index.php/Installing_AM387x_C6A814x_DM814x_Crypto_Support).
>> AES/DES crypto operation are working fine and I am able to ping
>> through IPsec tunnel from my board to PC and vice versa.
>
>
> Did you need to patch anything for openswan? Can you share your patches
> with us?
>
>
>> However when
>> I am trying ping with SHA-MD5 I am not able to ping ?to and from
>> Ubuntu machine .
>
>
>
>> My ubuntu machine details:
>> root@vnl-desktop:~# uname -a
>> Linux vnl-desktop 2.6.32-33-generic #72-Ubuntu SMP Fri Jul 29 21:08:37
>> UTC 2011 i686 GNU/Linux
>>
>> MYost probably it could be a IPsec configuration issue on Ubuntu
>> machine but I am not able to locate ?what configuration could affect
>> behavior of only one crypto algorithm. Since I am using same
>> configuration for IPsec for testing all Crypto algo supported in H/W
>> (DES/AES/SHA-MD5 )and ?I am successfully able to ping through IPSec
>> tunnel for DES and AES.
>
>
> I am not sure what you mean when you bundle "sha-md5" and "des and aes".
> A tunnel needs both an encryption algorithm (aes or 3des) and an
> authentication algothim (sha1, sha2, md5, etc). So for your tunnel
> to work, you would always be using either md5 or sha? Since you say
> some tunnels work, those algorithms must be working?
>
> I am not sure I understand exacly what works and what does not work.
>
> Paul
_______________________________________________
[email protected]
https://lists.openswan.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Micropayments: https://flattr.com/thing/38387/IPsec-for-Linux-made-easy
Building and Integrating Virtual Private Networks with Openswan:
http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/1904811256/104-3099591-2946327?n=283155
Jivin satpal parmar lays it down ...
> Sorry for that confusion Paul. Yes you are right we need both an
> encryption algorithm and and authentication algorithm for IPsec to
> work. As per my understanding we can do this either in H/W through
> some security engine or accelerators or through s/w libraries already
> supported in Linux. IPsec stack will first look for H/W support and
> if it fails it will fall back to s/w libraries.
>
> On my SOC we have H/W support for AES/DES/SHA-MD5 with driver support
> from TI. So when I say ping works with AES/DES I mean I see ESP
> packets going and received both side in wireshark when I ping board to
> PC(Ubuntu) or vice versa. So from above understanding I assume what is
> happening is encryption is handled by AES/DES hardware and
> authentication is been done in S/W. (Is there any better way to
> confirm other then wireshark ?)
>
> But when I include SHA-MD5 h/w driver support this arrangement fail to
> work. I do see ESP packets going from board and Ubuntu side but none
> of the sides are able to receive/handle these esp packets. This
> configuration /ping works fine when I connect another board in place
> of Ubuntu on other side . It's a strange behavior I am trying to
> debug.
If you can get two of your boards to communicate using openswan, but
cannot get one of your boards to talk to a PC running ubuntu then I would
say that there is a problem with the HW implementation of the hashing
functions (md5/sha) and it is somehow incorrect, but consistent.
For example, if the hashing always returned 0x1234, the two boards would
interoperate, but it wouldn't work with any other system.
You should start by testing those and comparing their output against the
kernels software implementations.
Cheers,
Davidm
> I think David can help us in understanding this situation better?
>
> @David: Hello David! Hope you are doing fine. I am back to bug you
> again! Please have a look at this mail and let me know if my
> explanation of behavior is consistent with your understanding of
> IPsec.
>
> Thanks for your response everyone. I will update if I make any
> progress on this issue.
>
> -SP
>
>
> On Fri, Mar 2, 2012 at 7:27 PM, Paul Wouters <[email protected]> wrote:
> > On Fri, 2 Mar 2012, satpal parmar wrote:
> >
> >>
> >> I recently ported Openswan on ARM cortex based SOC running linux
> >> 2.6.37 (ipsec netkey stack) and openswan 2.6.23. On this board I have
> >> H/W accelerator support for AES/DES/SHA.
> >>
> >> (http://processors.wiki.ti.com/index.php/Installing_AM387x_C6A814x_DM814x_Crypto_Support).
> >> AES/DES crypto operation are working fine and I am able to ping
> >> through IPsec tunnel from my board to PC and vice versa.
> >
> >
> > Did you need to patch anything for openswan? Can you share your patches
> > with us?
> >
> >
> >> However when
> >> I am trying ping with SHA-MD5 I am not able to ping ??to and from
> >> Ubuntu machine .
> >
> >
> >
> >> My ubuntu machine details:
> >> root@vnl-desktop:~# uname -a
> >> Linux vnl-desktop 2.6.32-33-generic #72-Ubuntu SMP Fri Jul 29 21:08:37
> >> UTC 2011 i686 GNU/Linux
> >>
> >> MYost probably it could be a IPsec configuration issue on Ubuntu
> >> machine but I am not able to locate ??what configuration could affect
> >> behavior of only one crypto algorithm. Since I am using same
> >> configuration for IPsec for testing all Crypto algo supported in H/W
> >> (DES/AES/SHA-MD5 )and ??I am successfully able to ping through IPSec
> >> tunnel for DES and AES.
> >
> >
> > I am not sure what you mean when you bundle "sha-md5" and "des and aes".
> > A tunnel needs both an encryption algorithm (aes or 3des) and an
> > authentication algothim (sha1, sha2, md5, etc). So for your tunnel
> > to work, you would always be using either md5 or sha? Since you say
> > some tunnels work, those algorithms must be working?
> >
> > I am not sure I understand exacly what works and what does not work.
> >
> > Paul
>
>
--
David McCullough, [email protected], Ph:+61 734352815
McAfee - SnapGear http://www.mcafee.com http://www.uCdot.org