2021-01-20 09:12:00

by Lee, Chun-Yi

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: [PATCH v4 0/4] Check codeSigning extended key usage extension

NIAP PP_OS certification requests that the OS shall validate the
CodeSigning extended key usage extension field for integrity
verifiction of exectable code:

https://www.niap-ccevs.org/MMO/PP/-442-/
FIA_X509_EXT.1.1

This patchset adds the logic for parsing the codeSigning EKU extension
field in X.509. And checking the CodeSigning EKU when verifying
signature of kernel module or kexec PE binary in PKCS#7.

v4:
Fixed the wording in patch description.

v3:
- Add codeSigning EKU to x509.genkey key generation config.
- Add openssl command option example for generating CodeSign EKU to
module-signing.rst document.

v2:
Changed the help wording in the Kconfig.

Lee, Chun-Yi (4):
X.509: Add CodeSigning extended key usage parsing
PKCS#7: Check codeSigning EKU for kernel module and kexec pe
verification
modsign: Add codeSigning EKU when generating X.509 key generation
config
Documentation/admin-guide/module-signing.rst: add openssl command
option example for CodeSign EKU

Documentation/admin-guide/module-signing.rst | 6 +++++
certs/Makefile | 1 +
certs/system_keyring.c | 2 +-
crypto/asymmetric_keys/Kconfig | 9 +++++++
crypto/asymmetric_keys/pkcs7_trust.c | 37 +++++++++++++++++++++++++---
crypto/asymmetric_keys/x509_cert_parser.c | 24 ++++++++++++++++++
include/crypto/pkcs7.h | 3 ++-
include/crypto/public_key.h | 1 +
include/linux/oid_registry.h | 5 ++++
9 files changed, 83 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

--
2.16.4


2021-01-20 09:12:09

by Lee, Chun-Yi

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: [PATCH 1/4] X.509: Add CodeSigning extended key usage parsing

This patch adds the logic for parsing the CodeSign extended key usage
extension in X.509. The parsing result will be set to the eku flag
which is carried by public key. It can be used in the PKCS#7
verification.

Signed-off-by: "Lee, Chun-Yi" <[email protected]>
---
crypto/asymmetric_keys/x509_cert_parser.c | 24 ++++++++++++++++++++++++
include/crypto/public_key.h | 1 +
include/linux/oid_registry.h | 5 +++++
3 files changed, 30 insertions(+)

diff --git a/crypto/asymmetric_keys/x509_cert_parser.c b/crypto/asymmetric_keys/x509_cert_parser.c
index 52c9b455fc7d..65721313b265 100644
--- a/crypto/asymmetric_keys/x509_cert_parser.c
+++ b/crypto/asymmetric_keys/x509_cert_parser.c
@@ -497,6 +497,8 @@ int x509_process_extension(void *context, size_t hdrlen,
struct x509_parse_context *ctx = context;
struct asymmetric_key_id *kid;
const unsigned char *v = value;
+ int i = 0;
+ enum OID oid;

pr_debug("Extension: %u\n", ctx->last_oid);

@@ -526,6 +528,28 @@ int x509_process_extension(void *context, size_t hdrlen,
return 0;
}

+ if (ctx->last_oid == OID_extKeyUsage) {
+ if (v[0] != ((ASN1_UNIV << 6) | ASN1_CONS_BIT | ASN1_SEQ) ||
+ v[1] != vlen - 2)
+ return -EBADMSG;
+ i += 2;
+
+ while (i < vlen) {
+ /* A 10 bytes EKU OID Octet blob =
+ * ASN1_OID + size byte + 8 bytes OID */
+ if (v[i] != ASN1_OID || v[i + 1] != 8 || (i + 10) > vlen)
+ return -EBADMSG;
+
+ oid = look_up_OID(v + i + 2, v[i + 1]);
+ if (oid == OID_codeSigning) {
+ ctx->cert->pub->eku |= EKU_codeSigning;
+ }
+ i += 10;
+ }
+ pr_debug("extKeyUsage: %d\n", ctx->cert->pub->eku);
+ return 0;
+ }
+
return 0;
}

diff --git a/include/crypto/public_key.h b/include/crypto/public_key.h
index 948c5203ca9c..07a1b28460a2 100644
--- a/include/crypto/public_key.h
+++ b/include/crypto/public_key.h
@@ -29,6 +29,7 @@ struct public_key {
bool key_is_private;
const char *id_type;
const char *pkey_algo;
+ unsigned int eku : 9; /* Extended Key Usage (9-bit) */
};

extern void public_key_free(struct public_key *key);
diff --git a/include/linux/oid_registry.h b/include/linux/oid_registry.h
index 4462ed2c18cd..e20e8eb53b21 100644
--- a/include/linux/oid_registry.h
+++ b/include/linux/oid_registry.h
@@ -113,9 +113,14 @@ enum OID {
OID_SM2_with_SM3, /* 1.2.156.10197.1.501 */
OID_sm3WithRSAEncryption, /* 1.2.156.10197.1.504 */

+ /* Extended key purpose OIDs [RFC 5280] */
+ OID_codeSigning, /* 1.3.6.1.5.5.7.3.3 */
+
OID__NR
};

+#define EKU_codeSigning (1 << 2)
+
extern enum OID look_up_OID(const void *data, size_t datasize);
extern int sprint_oid(const void *, size_t, char *, size_t);
extern int sprint_OID(enum OID, char *, size_t);
--
2.16.4

2021-01-20 09:33:14

by Lee, Chun-Yi

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: [PATCH 4/4] Documentation/admin-guide/module-signing.rst: add openssl command option example for CodeSign EKU

Add an openssl command option example for generating CodeSign extended
key usage in X.509 when CONFIG_CHECK_CODESIGN_EKU is enabled.

Signed-off-by: "Lee, Chun-Yi" <[email protected]>
---
Documentation/admin-guide/module-signing.rst | 6 ++++++
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)

diff --git a/Documentation/admin-guide/module-signing.rst b/Documentation/admin-guide/module-signing.rst
index 7d7c7c8a545c..b57b30c7125f 100644
--- a/Documentation/admin-guide/module-signing.rst
+++ b/Documentation/admin-guide/module-signing.rst
@@ -170,6 +170,12 @@ generate the public/private key files::
-config x509.genkey -outform PEM -out kernel_key.pem \
-keyout kernel_key.pem

+When ``CONFIG_CHECK_CODESIGN_EKU`` option be enabled, the following openssl
+command option should be added for generating CodeSign extended key usage in
+X.509::
+
+ -addext "extendedKeyUsage=codeSigning"
+
The full pathname for the resulting kernel_key.pem file can then be specified
in the ``CONFIG_MODULE_SIG_KEY`` option, and the certificate and key therein will
be used instead of an autogenerated keypair.
--
2.16.4

2021-01-21 02:11:46

by Jarkko Sakkinen

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] X.509: Add CodeSigning extended key usage parsing

On Wed, Jan 20, 2021 at 05:05:14PM +0800, Lee, Chun-Yi wrote:
> This patch adds the logic for parsing the CodeSign extended key usage
> extension in X.509. The parsing result will be set to the eku flag
> which is carried by public key. It can be used in the PKCS#7
> verification.
>
> Signed-off-by: "Lee, Chun-Yi" <[email protected]>
> ---
> crypto/asymmetric_keys/x509_cert_parser.c | 24 ++++++++++++++++++++++++
> include/crypto/public_key.h | 1 +
> include/linux/oid_registry.h | 5 +++++
> 3 files changed, 30 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/crypto/asymmetric_keys/x509_cert_parser.c b/crypto/asymmetric_keys/x509_cert_parser.c
> index 52c9b455fc7d..65721313b265 100644
> --- a/crypto/asymmetric_keys/x509_cert_parser.c
> +++ b/crypto/asymmetric_keys/x509_cert_parser.c
> @@ -497,6 +497,8 @@ int x509_process_extension(void *context, size_t hdrlen,
> struct x509_parse_context *ctx = context;
> struct asymmetric_key_id *kid;
> const unsigned char *v = value;
> + int i = 0;
> + enum OID oid;
>
> pr_debug("Extension: %u\n", ctx->last_oid);
>
> @@ -526,6 +528,28 @@ int x509_process_extension(void *context, size_t hdrlen,
> return 0;
> }
>
> + if (ctx->last_oid == OID_extKeyUsage) {
> + if (v[0] != ((ASN1_UNIV << 6) | ASN1_CONS_BIT | ASN1_SEQ) ||
> + v[1] != vlen - 2)
> + return -EBADMSG;
> + i += 2;
> +
> + while (i < vlen) {
> + /* A 10 bytes EKU OID Octet blob =
> + * ASN1_OID + size byte + 8 bytes OID */
> + if (v[i] != ASN1_OID || v[i + 1] != 8 || (i + 10) > vlen)
> + return -EBADMSG;
> +
> + oid = look_up_OID(v + i + 2, v[i + 1]);
> + if (oid == OID_codeSigning) {
> + ctx->cert->pub->eku |= EKU_codeSigning;
> + }
> + i += 10;
> + }
> + pr_debug("extKeyUsage: %d\n", ctx->cert->pub->eku);

With eBPF around, does this make any sense?

/Jarkko

> + return 0;
> + }
> +
> return 0;
> }
>
> diff --git a/include/crypto/public_key.h b/include/crypto/public_key.h
> index 948c5203ca9c..07a1b28460a2 100644
> --- a/include/crypto/public_key.h
> +++ b/include/crypto/public_key.h
> @@ -29,6 +29,7 @@ struct public_key {
> bool key_is_private;
> const char *id_type;
> const char *pkey_algo;
> + unsigned int eku : 9; /* Extended Key Usage (9-bit) */
> };
>
> extern void public_key_free(struct public_key *key);
> diff --git a/include/linux/oid_registry.h b/include/linux/oid_registry.h
> index 4462ed2c18cd..e20e8eb53b21 100644
> --- a/include/linux/oid_registry.h
> +++ b/include/linux/oid_registry.h
> @@ -113,9 +113,14 @@ enum OID {
> OID_SM2_with_SM3, /* 1.2.156.10197.1.501 */
> OID_sm3WithRSAEncryption, /* 1.2.156.10197.1.504 */
>
> + /* Extended key purpose OIDs [RFC 5280] */
> + OID_codeSigning, /* 1.3.6.1.5.5.7.3.3 */
> +
> OID__NR
> };
>
> +#define EKU_codeSigning (1 << 2)
> +
> extern enum OID look_up_OID(const void *data, size_t datasize);
> extern int sprint_oid(const void *, size_t, char *, size_t);
> extern int sprint_OID(enum OID, char *, size_t);
> --
> 2.16.4
>
>

2021-01-21 04:29:01

by joeyli

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] X.509: Add CodeSigning extended key usage parsing

Hi Jarkko,

On Thu, Jan 21, 2021 at 01:40:48AM +0200, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 20, 2021 at 05:05:14PM +0800, Lee, Chun-Yi wrote:
> > This patch adds the logic for parsing the CodeSign extended key usage
> > extension in X.509. The parsing result will be set to the eku flag
> > which is carried by public key. It can be used in the PKCS#7
> > verification.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: "Lee, Chun-Yi" <[email protected]>
> > ---
> > crypto/asymmetric_keys/x509_cert_parser.c | 24 ++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > include/crypto/public_key.h | 1 +
> > include/linux/oid_registry.h | 5 +++++
> > 3 files changed, 30 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/crypto/asymmetric_keys/x509_cert_parser.c b/crypto/asymmetric_keys/x509_cert_parser.c
> > index 52c9b455fc7d..65721313b265 100644
> > --- a/crypto/asymmetric_keys/x509_cert_parser.c
> > +++ b/crypto/asymmetric_keys/x509_cert_parser.c
> > @@ -497,6 +497,8 @@ int x509_process_extension(void *context, size_t hdrlen,
> > struct x509_parse_context *ctx = context;
> > struct asymmetric_key_id *kid;
> > const unsigned char *v = value;
> > + int i = 0;
> > + enum OID oid;
> >
> > pr_debug("Extension: %u\n", ctx->last_oid);
> >
> > @@ -526,6 +528,28 @@ int x509_process_extension(void *context, size_t hdrlen,
> > return 0;
> > }
> >
> > + if (ctx->last_oid == OID_extKeyUsage) {
> > + if (v[0] != ((ASN1_UNIV << 6) | ASN1_CONS_BIT | ASN1_SEQ) ||
> > + v[1] != vlen - 2)
> > + return -EBADMSG;
> > + i += 2;
> > +
> > + while (i < vlen) {
> > + /* A 10 bytes EKU OID Octet blob =
> > + * ASN1_OID + size byte + 8 bytes OID */
> > + if (v[i] != ASN1_OID || v[i + 1] != 8 || (i + 10) > vlen)
> > + return -EBADMSG;
> > +
> > + oid = look_up_OID(v + i + 2, v[i + 1]);
> > + if (oid == OID_codeSigning) {
> > + ctx->cert->pub->eku |= EKU_codeSigning;
> > + }
> > + i += 10;
> > + }
> > + pr_debug("extKeyUsage: %d\n", ctx->cert->pub->eku);
>
> With eBPF around, does this make any sense?
>

I think that the dynamic debug log is still easier for checking the EKU
setting.

Thanks
Joey Lee

2021-01-21 14:36:57

by Jarkko Sakkinen

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] X.509: Add CodeSigning extended key usage parsing

On Thu, Jan 21, 2021 at 12:23:53PM +0800, joeyli wrote:
> Hi Jarkko,
>
> On Thu, Jan 21, 2021 at 01:40:48AM +0200, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> > On Wed, Jan 20, 2021 at 05:05:14PM +0800, Lee, Chun-Yi wrote:
> > > This patch adds the logic for parsing the CodeSign extended key usage
> > > extension in X.509. The parsing result will be set to the eku flag
> > > which is carried by public key. It can be used in the PKCS#7
> > > verification.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: "Lee, Chun-Yi" <[email protected]>
> > > ---
> > > crypto/asymmetric_keys/x509_cert_parser.c | 24 ++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > > include/crypto/public_key.h | 1 +
> > > include/linux/oid_registry.h | 5 +++++
> > > 3 files changed, 30 insertions(+)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/crypto/asymmetric_keys/x509_cert_parser.c b/crypto/asymmetric_keys/x509_cert_parser.c
> > > index 52c9b455fc7d..65721313b265 100644
> > > --- a/crypto/asymmetric_keys/x509_cert_parser.c
> > > +++ b/crypto/asymmetric_keys/x509_cert_parser.c
> > > @@ -497,6 +497,8 @@ int x509_process_extension(void *context, size_t hdrlen,
> > > struct x509_parse_context *ctx = context;
> > > struct asymmetric_key_id *kid;
> > > const unsigned char *v = value;
> > > + int i = 0;
> > > + enum OID oid;
> > >
> > > pr_debug("Extension: %u\n", ctx->last_oid);
> > >
> > > @@ -526,6 +528,28 @@ int x509_process_extension(void *context, size_t hdrlen,
> > > return 0;
> > > }
> > >
> > > + if (ctx->last_oid == OID_extKeyUsage) {
> > > + if (v[0] != ((ASN1_UNIV << 6) | ASN1_CONS_BIT | ASN1_SEQ) ||
> > > + v[1] != vlen - 2)
> > > + return -EBADMSG;
> > > + i += 2;
> > > +
> > > + while (i < vlen) {
> > > + /* A 10 bytes EKU OID Octet blob =
> > > + * ASN1_OID + size byte + 8 bytes OID */
> > > + if (v[i] != ASN1_OID || v[i + 1] != 8 || (i + 10) > vlen)
> > > + return -EBADMSG;
> > > +
> > > + oid = look_up_OID(v + i + 2, v[i + 1]);
> > > + if (oid == OID_codeSigning) {
> > > + ctx->cert->pub->eku |= EKU_codeSigning;
> > > + }
> > > + i += 10;
> > > + }
> > > + pr_debug("extKeyUsage: %d\n", ctx->cert->pub->eku);
> >
> > With eBPF around, does this make any sense?
> >
>
> I think that the dynamic debug log is still easier for checking the EKU
> setting.

Why?

> Thanks
> Joey Lee

/Jarkko

2021-01-22 17:51:51

by Jarkko Sakkinen

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] X.509: Add CodeSigning extended key usage parsing

On Thu, Jan 21, 2021 at 11:23:06PM +0800, joeyli wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 21, 2021 at 04:32:26PM +0200, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> > On Thu, Jan 21, 2021 at 12:23:53PM +0800, joeyli wrote:
> > > Hi Jarkko,
> > >
> > > On Thu, Jan 21, 2021 at 01:40:48AM +0200, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> > > > On Wed, Jan 20, 2021 at 05:05:14PM +0800, Lee, Chun-Yi wrote:
> > > > > This patch adds the logic for parsing the CodeSign extended key usage
> > > > > extension in X.509. The parsing result will be set to the eku flag
> > > > > which is carried by public key. It can be used in the PKCS#7
> > > > > verification.
> > > > >
> > > > > Signed-off-by: "Lee, Chun-Yi" <[email protected]>
> > > > > ---
> > > > > crypto/asymmetric_keys/x509_cert_parser.c | 24 ++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > > > > include/crypto/public_key.h | 1 +
> > > > > include/linux/oid_registry.h | 5 +++++
> > > > > 3 files changed, 30 insertions(+)
> > > > >
> > > > > diff --git a/crypto/asymmetric_keys/x509_cert_parser.c b/crypto/asymmetric_keys/x509_cert_parser.c
> > > > > index 52c9b455fc7d..65721313b265 100644
> > > > > --- a/crypto/asymmetric_keys/x509_cert_parser.c
> > > > > +++ b/crypto/asymmetric_keys/x509_cert_parser.c
> > > > > @@ -497,6 +497,8 @@ int x509_process_extension(void *context, size_t hdrlen,
> > > > > struct x509_parse_context *ctx = context;
> > > > > struct asymmetric_key_id *kid;
> > > > > const unsigned char *v = value;
> > > > > + int i = 0;
> > > > > + enum OID oid;
> > > > >
> > > > > pr_debug("Extension: %u\n", ctx->last_oid);
> > > > >
> > > > > @@ -526,6 +528,28 @@ int x509_process_extension(void *context, size_t hdrlen,
> > > > > return 0;
> > > > > }
> > > > >
> > > > > + if (ctx->last_oid == OID_extKeyUsage) {
> > > > > + if (v[0] != ((ASN1_UNIV << 6) | ASN1_CONS_BIT | ASN1_SEQ) ||
> > > > > + v[1] != vlen - 2)
> > > > > + return -EBADMSG;
> > > > > + i += 2;
> > > > > +
> > > > > + while (i < vlen) {
> > > > > + /* A 10 bytes EKU OID Octet blob =
> > > > > + * ASN1_OID + size byte + 8 bytes OID */
> > > > > + if (v[i] != ASN1_OID || v[i + 1] != 8 || (i + 10) > vlen)
> > > > > + return -EBADMSG;
> > > > > +
> > > > > + oid = look_up_OID(v + i + 2, v[i + 1]);
> > > > > + if (oid == OID_codeSigning) {
> > > > > + ctx->cert->pub->eku |= EKU_codeSigning;
> > > > > + }
> > > > > + i += 10;
> > > > > + }
> > > > > + pr_debug("extKeyUsage: %d\n", ctx->cert->pub->eku);
> > > >
> > > > With eBPF around, does this make any sense?
> > > >
> > >
> > > I think that the dynamic debug log is still easier for checking the EKU
> > > setting.
> >
> > Why?
>
> There have some certificates may loaded when system boot. In booting stage,
> using dynamic debug log for checking EKU is easier than eBPF.
>
> I am not good on eBPF. Correct me if I missed anything, please!

I think it's fine have it, thanks.

/Jarkko

2021-01-27 09:55:15

by David Howells

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] X.509: Add CodeSigning extended key usage parsing

Jarkko Sakkinen <[email protected]> wrote:

> With eBPF around, does this make any sense?

bpf/ebpf may be partially disabled if you boot in secure boot mode - not sure
whether that affects this.

David