2010-01-14 14:05:45

by Jan Glauber

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: vmac test fails on s390

Hi,

Jan 14 14:47:38 h42lp52 kernel: alg: hash: Test 1 failed for vmac(aes-s390)
Jan 14 14:47:38 h42lp52 kernel: 00000000: e7 79 33 b7 fd 8a d7 cb

Looking at the digest from the failing test vector:

.digest = "\xcb\xd7\x8a\xfd\xb7\x33\x79\xe7",

the output looks somehow familiar... Maybe a missing endian conversion?
The patch fixes the test for me but it is just a wild guess and maybe
it should be done at another place?

Jan

diff --git a/crypto/vmac.c b/crypto/vmac.c
index 0a9468e..0e23dfb 100644
--- a/crypto/vmac.c
+++ b/crypto/vmac.c
@@ -359,7 +359,7 @@ static u64 l3hash(u64 p1, u64 p2,
rl += t;
rl += (0 - (rl < t)) & 257;
rl += (0 - (rl > p64-1)) & 257;
- return rl;
+ return le64_to_cpup(&rl);
}

static void vhash_update(const unsigned char *m,




2010-01-17 11:05:54

by Herbert Xu

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: vmac test fails on s390

On Thu, Jan 14, 2010 at 02:05:30PM +0000, Jan Glauber wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Jan 14 14:47:38 h42lp52 kernel: alg: hash: Test 1 failed for vmac(aes-s390)
> Jan 14 14:47:38 h42lp52 kernel: 00000000: e7 79 33 b7 fd 8a d7 cb
>
> Looking at the digest from the failing test vector:
>
> .digest = "\xcb\xd7\x8a\xfd\xb7\x33\x79\xe7",
>
> the output looks somehow familiar... Maybe a missing endian conversion?
> The patch fixes the test for me but it is just a wild guess and maybe
> it should be done at another place?

Shane, please look into this.

Thanks,
--
Visit Openswan at http://www.openswan.org/
Email: Herbert Xu ~{PmV>HI~} <[email protected]>
Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/
PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt

2010-02-11 03:19:50

by Shane Wang

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: [PATCH] to fix vmac test fails on s390

Herbert,

Here is the patch to fix it. I missed an important fact that the digest of vmac is not a string or a char array, but an 64bit integer.

This patch is to fix the vmac algorithm, add more test cases for vmac, and fix the test failure on some big endian system like s390.
(the attachment is for applying the patch)

Signed-off-by: Shane Wang <[email protected]>


crypto/testmgr.h | 96 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
crypto/vmac.c | 74 ++++++++++++++++------------------
2 files changed, 128 insertions(+), 42 deletions(-)

diff -r 91636f5ce7a2 crypto/testmgr.h
--- a/crypto/testmgr.h Thu Feb 11 00:45:57 2010 -0800
+++ b/crypto/testmgr.h Thu Feb 11 01:20:22 2010 -0800
@@ -1669,17 +1669,105 @@ static struct hash_testvec aes_xcbc128_t
}
};

-#define VMAC_AES_TEST_VECTORS 1
-static char vmac_string[128] = {'\x01', '\x01', '\x01', '\x01',
+#define VMAC_AES_TEST_VECTORS 8
+static char vmac_string1[128] = {'\x01', '\x01', '\x01', '\x01',
'\x02', '\x03', '\x02', '\x02',
'\x02', '\x04', '\x01', '\x07',
'\x04', '\x01', '\x04', '\x03',};
+static char vmac_string2[128] = {'a', 'b', 'c',};
+static char vmac_string3[128] = {'a', 'b', 'c', 'a', 'b', 'c',
+ 'a', 'b', 'c', 'a', 'b', 'c',
+ 'a', 'b', 'c', 'a', 'b', 'c',
+ 'a', 'b', 'c', 'a', 'b', 'c',
+ 'a', 'b', 'c', 'a', 'b', 'c',
+ 'a', 'b', 'c', 'a', 'b', 'c',
+ 'a', 'b', 'c', 'a', 'b', 'c',
+ 'a', 'b', 'c', 'a', 'b', 'c',
+ };
+
static struct hash_testvec aes_vmac128_tv_template[] = {
{
+ .key = "\x00\x01\x02\x03\x04\x05\x06\x07"
+ "\x08\x09\x0a\x0b\x0c\x0d\x0e\x0f",
+ .plaintext = NULL,
+#ifdef __LITTLE_ENDIAN
+ .digest = "\x07\x58\x80\x35\x77\xa4\x7b\x54",
+#else
+ .digest = "\x54\x7b\xa4\x77\x35\x80\x58\x07",
+#endif
+ .psize = 0,
+ .ksize = 16,
+ }, {
.key = "\x00\x01\x02\x03\x04\x05\x06\x07"
"\x08\x09\x0a\x0b\x0c\x0d\x0e\x0f",
- .plaintext = vmac_string,
- .digest = "\xcb\xd7\x8a\xfd\xb7\x33\x79\xe7",
+ .plaintext = vmac_string1,
+#ifdef __LITTLE_ENDIAN
+ .digest = "\xce\xf5\x3c\xd3\xae\x68\x8c\xa1",
+#else
+ .digest = "\xa1\x8c\x68\xae\xd3\x3c\xf5\xce",
+#endif
+ .psize = 128,
+ .ksize = 16,
+ }, {
+ .key = "\x00\x01\x02\x03\x04\x05\x06\x07"
+ "\x08\x09\x0a\x0b\x0c\x0d\x0e\x0f",
+ .plaintext = vmac_string2,
+#ifdef __LITTLE_ENDIAN
+ .digest = "\xc9\x27\xb0\x73\x81\xbd\x14\x2d",
+#else
+ .digest = "\x2d\x14\xbd\x81\x73\xb0\x27\xc9",
+#endif
+ .psize = 128,
+ .ksize = 16,
+ }, {
+ .key = "\x00\x01\x02\x03\x04\x05\x06\x07"
+ "\x08\x09\x0a\x0b\x0c\x0d\x0e\x0f",
+ .plaintext = vmac_string3,
+#ifdef __LITTLE_ENDIAN
+ .digest = "\x8d\x1a\x95\x8c\x98\x47\x0b\x19",
+#else
+ .digest = "\x19\x0b\x47\x98\x8c\x95\x1a\x8d",
+#endif
+ .psize = 128,
+ .ksize = 16,
+ }, {
+ .key = "abcdefghijklmnop",
+ .plaintext = NULL,
+#ifdef __LITTLE_ENDIAN
+ .digest = "\x3b\x89\xa1\x26\x9e\x55\x8f\x84",
+#else
+ .digest = "\x84\x8f\x55\x9e\x26\xa1\x89\x3b",
+#endif
+ .psize = 0,
+ .ksize = 16,
+ }, {
+ .key = "abcdefghijklmnop",
+ .plaintext = vmac_string1,
+#ifdef __LITTLE_ENDIAN
+ .digest = "\xab\x5e\xab\xb0\xf6\x8d\x74\xc2",
+#else
+ .digest = "\xc2\x74\x8d\xf6\xb0\xab\x5e\xab",
+#endif
+ .psize = 128,
+ .ksize = 16,
+ }, {
+ .key = "abcdefghijklmnop",
+ .plaintext = vmac_string2,
+#ifdef __LITTLE_ENDIAN
+ .digest = "\x11\x15\x68\x42\x3d\x7b\x09\xdf",
+#else
+ .digest = "\xdf\x09\x7b\x3d\x42\x68\x15\x11",
+#endif
+ .psize = 128,
+ .ksize = 16,
+ }, {
+ .key = "abcdefghijklmnop",
+ .plaintext = vmac_string3,
+#ifdef __LITTLE_ENDIAN
+ .digest = "\x8b\x32\x8f\xe1\xed\x8f\xfa\xd4",
+#else
+ .digest = "\xd4\xfa\x8f\xed\xe1\x8f\x32\x8b",
+#endif
.psize = 128,
.ksize = 16,
},
diff -r 91636f5ce7a2 crypto/vmac.c
--- a/crypto/vmac.c Thu Feb 11 00:45:57 2010 -0800
+++ b/crypto/vmac.c Thu Feb 11 01:20:22 2010 -0800
@@ -42,6 +42,8 @@ const u64 m63 = UINT64_C(0x7ffffffffff
const u64 m63 = UINT64_C(0x7fffffffffffffff); /* 63-bit mask */
const u64 m64 = UINT64_C(0xffffffffffffffff); /* 64-bit mask */
const u64 mpoly = UINT64_C(0x1fffffff1fffffff); /* Poly key mask */
+
+#define pe64_to_cpup le64_to_cpup /* Prefer little endian */

#ifdef __LITTLE_ENDIAN
#define INDEX_HIGH 1
@@ -110,8 +112,8 @@ const u64 mpoly = UINT64_C(0x1fffffff1ff
int i; u64 th, tl; \
rh = rl = 0; \
for (i = 0; i < nw; i += 2) { \
- MUL64(th, tl, le64_to_cpup((mp)+i)+(kp)[i], \
- le64_to_cpup((mp)+i+1)+(kp)[i+1]); \
+ MUL64(th, tl, pe64_to_cpup((mp)+i)+(kp)[i], \
+ pe64_to_cpup((mp)+i+1)+(kp)[i+1]); \
ADD128(rh, rl, th, tl); \
} \
} while (0)
@@ -121,11 +123,11 @@ const u64 mpoly = UINT64_C(0x1fffffff1ff
int i; u64 th, tl; \
rh1 = rl1 = rh = rl = 0; \
for (i = 0; i < nw; i += 2) { \
- MUL64(th, tl, le64_to_cpup((mp)+i)+(kp)[i], \
- le64_to_cpup((mp)+i+1)+(kp)[i+1]); \
+ MUL64(th, tl, pe64_to_cpup((mp)+i)+(kp)[i], \
+ pe64_to_cpup((mp)+i+1)+(kp)[i+1]); \
ADD128(rh, rl, th, tl); \
- MUL64(th, tl, le64_to_cpup((mp)+i)+(kp)[i+2], \
- le64_to_cpup((mp)+i+1)+(kp)[i+3]); \
+ MUL64(th, tl, pe64_to_cpup((mp)+i)+(kp)[i+2], \
+ pe64_to_cpup((mp)+i+1)+(kp)[i+3]); \
ADD128(rh1, rl1, th, tl); \
} \
} while (0)
@@ -136,17 +138,17 @@ const u64 mpoly = UINT64_C(0x1fffffff1ff
int i; u64 th, tl; \
rh = rl = 0; \
for (i = 0; i < nw; i += 8) { \
- MUL64(th, tl, le64_to_cpup((mp)+i)+(kp)[i], \
- le64_to_cpup((mp)+i+1)+(kp)[i+1]); \
+ MUL64(th, tl, pe64_to_cpup((mp)+i)+(kp)[i], \
+ pe64_to_cpup((mp)+i+1)+(kp)[i+1]); \
ADD128(rh, rl, th, tl); \
- MUL64(th, tl, le64_to_cpup((mp)+i+2)+(kp)[i+2], \
- le64_to_cpup((mp)+i+3)+(kp)[i+3]); \
+ MUL64(th, tl, pe64_to_cpup((mp)+i+2)+(kp)[i+2], \
+ pe64_to_cpup((mp)+i+3)+(kp)[i+3]); \
ADD128(rh, rl, th, tl); \
- MUL64(th, tl, le64_to_cpup((mp)+i+4)+(kp)[i+4], \
- le64_to_cpup((mp)+i+5)+(kp)[i+5]); \
+ MUL64(th, tl, pe64_to_cpup((mp)+i+4)+(kp)[i+4], \
+ pe64_to_cpup((mp)+i+5)+(kp)[i+5]); \
ADD128(rh, rl, th, tl); \
- MUL64(th, tl, le64_to_cpup((mp)+i+6)+(kp)[i+6], \
- le64_to_cpup((mp)+i+7)+(kp)[i+7]); \
+ MUL64(th, tl, pe64_to_cpup((mp)+i+6)+(kp)[i+6], \
+ pe64_to_cpup((mp)+i+7)+(kp)[i+7]); \
ADD128(rh, rl, th, tl); \
} \
} while (0)
@@ -156,29 +158,29 @@ const u64 mpoly = UINT64_C(0x1fffffff1ff
int i; u64 th, tl; \
rh1 = rl1 = rh = rl = 0; \
for (i = 0; i < nw; i += 8) { \
- MUL64(th, tl, le64_to_cpup((mp)+i)+(kp)[i], \
- le64_to_cpup((mp)+i+1)+(kp)[i+1]); \
+ MUL64(th, tl, pe64_to_cpup((mp)+i)+(kp)[i], \
+ pe64_to_cpup((mp)+i+1)+(kp)[i+1]); \
ADD128(rh, rl, th, tl); \
- MUL64(th, tl, le64_to_cpup((mp)+i)+(kp)[i+2], \
- le64_to_cpup((mp)+i+1)+(kp)[i+3]); \
+ MUL64(th, tl, pe64_to_cpup((mp)+i)+(kp)[i+2], \
+ pe64_to_cpup((mp)+i+1)+(kp)[i+3]); \
ADD128(rh1, rl1, th, tl); \
- MUL64(th, tl, le64_to_cpup((mp)+i+2)+(kp)[i+2], \
- le64_to_cpup((mp)+i+3)+(kp)[i+3]); \
+ MUL64(th, tl, pe64_to_cpup((mp)+i+2)+(kp)[i+2], \
+ pe64_to_cpup((mp)+i+3)+(kp)[i+3]); \
ADD128(rh, rl, th, tl); \
- MUL64(th, tl, le64_to_cpup((mp)+i+2)+(kp)[i+4], \
- le64_to_cpup((mp)+i+3)+(kp)[i+5]); \
+ MUL64(th, tl, pe64_to_cpup((mp)+i+2)+(kp)[i+4], \
+ pe64_to_cpup((mp)+i+3)+(kp)[i+5]); \
ADD128(rh1, rl1, th, tl); \
- MUL64(th, tl, le64_to_cpup((mp)+i+4)+(kp)[i+4], \
- le64_to_cpup((mp)+i+5)+(kp)[i+5]); \
+ MUL64(th, tl, pe64_to_cpup((mp)+i+4)+(kp)[i+4], \
+ pe64_to_cpup((mp)+i+5)+(kp)[i+5]); \
ADD128(rh, rl, th, tl); \
- MUL64(th, tl, le64_to_cpup((mp)+i+4)+(kp)[i+6], \
- le64_to_cpup((mp)+i+5)+(kp)[i+7]); \
+ MUL64(th, tl, pe64_to_cpup((mp)+i+4)+(kp)[i+6], \
+ pe64_to_cpup((mp)+i+5)+(kp)[i+7]); \
ADD128(rh1, rl1, th, tl); \
- MUL64(th, tl, le64_to_cpup((mp)+i+6)+(kp)[i+6], \
- le64_to_cpup((mp)+i+7)+(kp)[i+7]); \
+ MUL64(th, tl, pe64_to_cpup((mp)+i+6)+(kp)[i+6], \
+ pe64_to_cpup((mp)+i+7)+(kp)[i+7]); \
ADD128(rh, rl, th, tl); \
- MUL64(th, tl, le64_to_cpup((mp)+i+6)+(kp)[i+8], \
- le64_to_cpup((mp)+i+7)+(kp)[i+9]); \
+ MUL64(th, tl, pe64_to_cpup((mp)+i+6)+(kp)[i+8], \
+ pe64_to_cpup((mp)+i+7)+(kp)[i+9]); \
ADD128(rh1, rl1, th, tl); \
} \
} while (0)
@@ -216,8 +218,8 @@ const u64 mpoly = UINT64_C(0x1fffffff1ff
int i; \
rh = rl = t = 0; \
for (i = 0; i < nw; i += 2) { \
- t1 = le64_to_cpup(mp+i) + kp[i]; \
- t2 = le64_to_cpup(mp+i+1) + kp[i+1]; \
+ t1 = pe64_to_cpup(mp+i) + kp[i]; \
+ t2 = pe64_to_cpup(mp+i+1) + kp[i+1]; \
m2 = MUL32(t1 >> 32, t2); \
m1 = MUL32(t1, t2 >> 32); \
ADD128(rh, rl, MUL32(t1 >> 32, t2 >> 32), \
@@ -322,8 +324,7 @@ static void vhash_abort(struct vmac_ctx
ctx->first_block_processed = 0;
}

-static u64 l3hash(u64 p1, u64 p2,
- u64 k1, u64 k2, u64 len)
+static u64 l3hash(u64 p1, u64 p2, u64 k1, u64 k2, u64 len)
{
u64 rh, rl, t, z = 0;

@@ -549,10 +550,6 @@ static int vmac_setkey(struct crypto_sha

static int vmac_init(struct shash_desc *pdesc)
{
- struct crypto_shash *parent = pdesc->tfm;
- struct vmac_ctx_t *ctx = crypto_shash_ctx(parent);
-
- memset(&ctx->__vmac_ctx, 0, sizeof(struct vmac_ctx));
return 0;
}

@@ -575,6 +572,7 @@ static int vmac_final(struct shash_desc
u8 nonce[16] = {};

mac = vmac(NULL, 0, nonce, NULL, ctx);
+
memcpy(out, &mac, sizeof(vmac_t));
memset(&mac, 0, sizeof(vmac_t));
memset(&ctx->__vmac_ctx, 0, sizeof(struct vmac_ctx));


Herbert Xu wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 14, 2010 at 02:05:30PM +0000, Jan Glauber wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Jan 14 14:47:38 h42lp52 kernel: alg: hash: Test 1 failed for
>> vmac(aes-s390) Jan 14 14:47:38 h42lp52 kernel: 00000000: e7 79 33 b7
>> fd 8a d7 cb
>>
>> Looking at the digest from the failing test vector:
>>
>> .digest = "\xcb\xd7\x8a\xfd\xb7\x33\x79\xe7",
>>
>> the output looks somehow familiar... Maybe a missing endian
>> conversion? The patch fixes the test for me but it is just a wild
>> guess and maybe
>> it should be done at another place?
>
> Shane, please look into this.
>
> Thanks,


Attachments:
vmac_fix.patch (8.97 kB)
vmac_fix.patch

2010-02-16 12:39:43

by Herbert Xu

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH] to fix vmac test fails on s390

On Thu, Feb 11, 2010 at 11:18:08AM +0800, Wang, Shane wrote:
>
> static struct hash_testvec aes_vmac128_tv_template[] = {
> {
> + .key = "\x00\x01\x02\x03\x04\x05\x06\x07"
> + "\x08\x09\x0a\x0b\x0c\x0d\x0e\x0f",
> + .plaintext = NULL,
> +#ifdef __LITTLE_ENDIAN
> + .digest = "\x07\x58\x80\x35\x77\xa4\x7b\x54",
> +#else
> + .digest = "\x54\x7b\xa4\x77\x35\x80\x58\x07",
> +#endif
> + .psize = 0,
> + .ksize = 16,
> + }, {

Sorry but you can't fix it like this. Your hash output must be
invariant with respect to endianness.

That means, whether I run it on a big-endian machine or a little-
endian one it should produce the same output.

Otherwise this hash will be totally useless as soon as you get
onto the network.

Cheers,
--
Visit Openswan at http://www.openswan.org/
Email: Herbert Xu ~{PmV>HI~} <[email protected]>
Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/
PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt

2010-02-20 06:30:26

by Shane Wang

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: RE: [PATCH] to fix vmac test fails on s390

Herbert Xu wrote:
> Sorry but you can't fix it like this. Your hash output must be
> invariant with respect to endianness.
>
> That means, whether I run it on a big-endian machine or a little-
> endian one it should produce the same output.
>
> Otherwise this hash will be totally useless as soon as you get
> onto the network.
>
> Cheers,

OK, I understand.
The problem is the VMAC result is an integer instead of a string.
I also tested the original VMAC algorithm (w/ Jan), since I ported from it.
It proved the above.

In this case, should I change the original algorithm to produce an invariant string output?

Thanks.
Shane

2010-02-22 03:21:45

by Shane Wang

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: RE: [PATCH] to fix vmac test fails on s390

<Updated again and Resend>

This patch is to fix the vmac algorithm, add more test cases for vmac, and fix the test failure on some big endian system like s390.

Signed-off-by: Shane Wang <[email protected]>

crypto/testmgr.h | 64 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
crypto/vmac.c | 80 ++++++++++++++++++++++-----------------------
2 files changed, 100 insertions(+), 44 deletions(-)

diff -r 91636f5ce7a2 crypto/testmgr.h
--- a/crypto/testmgr.h Thu Feb 11 00:45:57 2010 -0800
+++ b/crypto/testmgr.h Mon Feb 22 05:24:19 2010 -0500
@@ -1669,17 +1669,73 @@ static struct hash_testvec aes_xcbc128_t
}
};

-#define VMAC_AES_TEST_VECTORS 1
-static char vmac_string[128] = {'\x01', '\x01', '\x01', '\x01',
+#define VMAC_AES_TEST_VECTORS 8
+static char vmac_string1[128] = {'\x01', '\x01', '\x01', '\x01',
'\x02', '\x03', '\x02', '\x02',
'\x02', '\x04', '\x01', '\x07',
'\x04', '\x01', '\x04', '\x03',};
+static char vmac_string2[128] = {'a', 'b', 'c',};
+static char vmac_string3[128] = {'a', 'b', 'c', 'a', 'b', 'c',
+ 'a', 'b', 'c', 'a', 'b', 'c',
+ 'a', 'b', 'c', 'a', 'b', 'c',
+ 'a', 'b', 'c', 'a', 'b', 'c',
+ 'a', 'b', 'c', 'a', 'b', 'c',
+ 'a', 'b', 'c', 'a', 'b', 'c',
+ 'a', 'b', 'c', 'a', 'b', 'c',
+ 'a', 'b', 'c', 'a', 'b', 'c',
+ };
+
static struct hash_testvec aes_vmac128_tv_template[] = {
{
+ .key = "\x00\x01\x02\x03\x04\x05\x06\x07"
+ "\x08\x09\x0a\x0b\x0c\x0d\x0e\x0f",
+ .plaintext = NULL,
+ .digest = "\x07\x58\x80\x35\x77\xa4\x7b\x54",
+ .psize = 0,
+ .ksize = 16,
+ }, {
.key = "\x00\x01\x02\x03\x04\x05\x06\x07"
"\x08\x09\x0a\x0b\x0c\x0d\x0e\x0f",
- .plaintext = vmac_string,
- .digest = "\xcb\xd7\x8a\xfd\xb7\x33\x79\xe7",
+ .plaintext = vmac_string1,
+ .digest = "\xce\xf5\x3c\xd3\xae\x68\x8c\xa1",
+ .psize = 128,
+ .ksize = 16,
+ }, {
+ .key = "\x00\x01\x02\x03\x04\x05\x06\x07"
+ "\x08\x09\x0a\x0b\x0c\x0d\x0e\x0f",
+ .plaintext = vmac_string2,
+ .digest = "\xc9\x27\xb0\x73\x81\xbd\x14\x2d",
+ .psize = 128,
+ .ksize = 16,
+ }, {
+ .key = "\x00\x01\x02\x03\x04\x05\x06\x07"
+ "\x08\x09\x0a\x0b\x0c\x0d\x0e\x0f",
+ .plaintext = vmac_string3,
+ .digest = "\x8d\x1a\x95\x8c\x98\x47\x0b\x19",
+ .psize = 128,
+ .ksize = 16,
+ }, {
+ .key = "abcdefghijklmnop",
+ .plaintext = NULL,
+ .digest = "\x3b\x89\xa1\x26\x9e\x55\x8f\x84",
+ .psize = 0,
+ .ksize = 16,
+ }, {
+ .key = "abcdefghijklmnop",
+ .plaintext = vmac_string1,
+ .digest = "\xab\x5e\xab\xb0\xf6\x8d\x74\xc2",
+ .psize = 128,
+ .ksize = 16,
+ }, {
+ .key = "abcdefghijklmnop",
+ .plaintext = vmac_string2,
+ .digest = "\x11\x15\x68\x42\x3d\x7b\x09\xdf",
+ .psize = 128,
+ .ksize = 16,
+ }, {
+ .key = "abcdefghijklmnop",
+ .plaintext = vmac_string3,
+ .digest = "\x8b\x32\x8f\xe1\xed\x8f\xfa\xd4",
.psize = 128,
.ksize = 16,
},
diff -r 91636f5ce7a2 crypto/vmac.c
--- a/crypto/vmac.c Thu Feb 11 00:45:57 2010 -0800
+++ b/crypto/vmac.c Mon Feb 22 05:24:19 2010 -0500
@@ -42,6 +42,8 @@ const u64 m63 = UINT64_C(0x7ffffffffff
const u64 m63 = UINT64_C(0x7fffffffffffffff); /* 63-bit mask */
const u64 m64 = UINT64_C(0xffffffffffffffff); /* 64-bit mask */
const u64 mpoly = UINT64_C(0x1fffffff1fffffff); /* Poly key mask */
+
+#define pe64_to_cpup le64_to_cpup /* Prefer little endian */

#ifdef __LITTLE_ENDIAN
#define INDEX_HIGH 1
@@ -110,8 +112,8 @@ const u64 mpoly = UINT64_C(0x1fffffff1ff
int i; u64 th, tl; \
rh = rl = 0; \
for (i = 0; i < nw; i += 2) { \
- MUL64(th, tl, le64_to_cpup((mp)+i)+(kp)[i], \
- le64_to_cpup((mp)+i+1)+(kp)[i+1]); \
+ MUL64(th, tl, pe64_to_cpup((mp)+i)+(kp)[i], \
+ pe64_to_cpup((mp)+i+1)+(kp)[i+1]); \
ADD128(rh, rl, th, tl); \
} \
} while (0)
@@ -121,11 +123,11 @@ const u64 mpoly = UINT64_C(0x1fffffff1ff
int i; u64 th, tl; \
rh1 = rl1 = rh = rl = 0; \
for (i = 0; i < nw; i += 2) { \
- MUL64(th, tl, le64_to_cpup((mp)+i)+(kp)[i], \
- le64_to_cpup((mp)+i+1)+(kp)[i+1]); \
+ MUL64(th, tl, pe64_to_cpup((mp)+i)+(kp)[i], \
+ pe64_to_cpup((mp)+i+1)+(kp)[i+1]); \
ADD128(rh, rl, th, tl); \
- MUL64(th, tl, le64_to_cpup((mp)+i)+(kp)[i+2], \
- le64_to_cpup((mp)+i+1)+(kp)[i+3]); \
+ MUL64(th, tl, pe64_to_cpup((mp)+i)+(kp)[i+2], \
+ pe64_to_cpup((mp)+i+1)+(kp)[i+3]); \
ADD128(rh1, rl1, th, tl); \
} \
} while (0)
@@ -136,17 +138,17 @@ const u64 mpoly = UINT64_C(0x1fffffff1ff
int i; u64 th, tl; \
rh = rl = 0; \
for (i = 0; i < nw; i += 8) { \
- MUL64(th, tl, le64_to_cpup((mp)+i)+(kp)[i], \
- le64_to_cpup((mp)+i+1)+(kp)[i+1]); \
+ MUL64(th, tl, pe64_to_cpup((mp)+i)+(kp)[i], \
+ pe64_to_cpup((mp)+i+1)+(kp)[i+1]); \
ADD128(rh, rl, th, tl); \
- MUL64(th, tl, le64_to_cpup((mp)+i+2)+(kp)[i+2], \
- le64_to_cpup((mp)+i+3)+(kp)[i+3]); \
+ MUL64(th, tl, pe64_to_cpup((mp)+i+2)+(kp)[i+2], \
+ pe64_to_cpup((mp)+i+3)+(kp)[i+3]); \
ADD128(rh, rl, th, tl); \
- MUL64(th, tl, le64_to_cpup((mp)+i+4)+(kp)[i+4], \
- le64_to_cpup((mp)+i+5)+(kp)[i+5]); \
+ MUL64(th, tl, pe64_to_cpup((mp)+i+4)+(kp)[i+4], \
+ pe64_to_cpup((mp)+i+5)+(kp)[i+5]); \
ADD128(rh, rl, th, tl); \
- MUL64(th, tl, le64_to_cpup((mp)+i+6)+(kp)[i+6], \
- le64_to_cpup((mp)+i+7)+(kp)[i+7]); \
+ MUL64(th, tl, pe64_to_cpup((mp)+i+6)+(kp)[i+6], \
+ pe64_to_cpup((mp)+i+7)+(kp)[i+7]); \
ADD128(rh, rl, th, tl); \
} \
} while (0)
@@ -156,29 +158,29 @@ const u64 mpoly = UINT64_C(0x1fffffff1ff
int i; u64 th, tl; \
rh1 = rl1 = rh = rl = 0; \
for (i = 0; i < nw; i += 8) { \
- MUL64(th, tl, le64_to_cpup((mp)+i)+(kp)[i], \
- le64_to_cpup((mp)+i+1)+(kp)[i+1]); \
+ MUL64(th, tl, pe64_to_cpup((mp)+i)+(kp)[i], \
+ pe64_to_cpup((mp)+i+1)+(kp)[i+1]); \
ADD128(rh, rl, th, tl); \
- MUL64(th, tl, le64_to_cpup((mp)+i)+(kp)[i+2], \
- le64_to_cpup((mp)+i+1)+(kp)[i+3]); \
+ MUL64(th, tl, pe64_to_cpup((mp)+i)+(kp)[i+2], \
+ pe64_to_cpup((mp)+i+1)+(kp)[i+3]); \
ADD128(rh1, rl1, th, tl); \
- MUL64(th, tl, le64_to_cpup((mp)+i+2)+(kp)[i+2], \
- le64_to_cpup((mp)+i+3)+(kp)[i+3]); \
+ MUL64(th, tl, pe64_to_cpup((mp)+i+2)+(kp)[i+2], \
+ pe64_to_cpup((mp)+i+3)+(kp)[i+3]); \
ADD128(rh, rl, th, tl); \
- MUL64(th, tl, le64_to_cpup((mp)+i+2)+(kp)[i+4], \
- le64_to_cpup((mp)+i+3)+(kp)[i+5]); \
+ MUL64(th, tl, pe64_to_cpup((mp)+i+2)+(kp)[i+4], \
+ pe64_to_cpup((mp)+i+3)+(kp)[i+5]); \
ADD128(rh1, rl1, th, tl); \
- MUL64(th, tl, le64_to_cpup((mp)+i+4)+(kp)[i+4], \
- le64_to_cpup((mp)+i+5)+(kp)[i+5]); \
+ MUL64(th, tl, pe64_to_cpup((mp)+i+4)+(kp)[i+4], \
+ pe64_to_cpup((mp)+i+5)+(kp)[i+5]); \
ADD128(rh, rl, th, tl); \
- MUL64(th, tl, le64_to_cpup((mp)+i+4)+(kp)[i+6], \
- le64_to_cpup((mp)+i+5)+(kp)[i+7]); \
+ MUL64(th, tl, pe64_to_cpup((mp)+i+4)+(kp)[i+6], \
+ pe64_to_cpup((mp)+i+5)+(kp)[i+7]); \
ADD128(rh1, rl1, th, tl); \
- MUL64(th, tl, le64_to_cpup((mp)+i+6)+(kp)[i+6], \
- le64_to_cpup((mp)+i+7)+(kp)[i+7]); \
+ MUL64(th, tl, pe64_to_cpup((mp)+i+6)+(kp)[i+6], \
+ pe64_to_cpup((mp)+i+7)+(kp)[i+7]); \
ADD128(rh, rl, th, tl); \
- MUL64(th, tl, le64_to_cpup((mp)+i+6)+(kp)[i+8], \
- le64_to_cpup((mp)+i+7)+(kp)[i+9]); \
+ MUL64(th, tl, pe64_to_cpup((mp)+i+6)+(kp)[i+8], \
+ pe64_to_cpup((mp)+i+7)+(kp)[i+9]); \
ADD128(rh1, rl1, th, tl); \
} \
} while (0)
@@ -216,8 +218,8 @@ const u64 mpoly = UINT64_C(0x1fffffff1ff
int i; \
rh = rl = t = 0; \
for (i = 0; i < nw; i += 2) { \
- t1 = le64_to_cpup(mp+i) + kp[i]; \
- t2 = le64_to_cpup(mp+i+1) + kp[i+1]; \
+ t1 = pe64_to_cpup(mp+i) + kp[i]; \
+ t2 = pe64_to_cpup(mp+i+1) + kp[i+1]; \
m2 = MUL32(t1 >> 32, t2); \
m1 = MUL32(t1, t2 >> 32); \
ADD128(rh, rl, MUL32(t1 >> 32, t2 >> 32), \
@@ -322,8 +324,7 @@ static void vhash_abort(struct vmac_ctx
ctx->first_block_processed = 0;
}

-static u64 l3hash(u64 p1, u64 p2,
- u64 k1, u64 k2, u64 len)
+static u64 l3hash(u64 p1, u64 p2, u64 k1, u64 k2, u64 len)
{
u64 rh, rl, t, z = 0;

@@ -456,7 +457,7 @@ static u64 vmac(unsigned char m[], unsig
struct vmac_ctx_t *ctx)
{
u64 *in_n, *out_p;
- u64 p, h;
+ u64 p, h, r;
int i;

in_n = ctx->__vmac_ctx.cached_nonce;
@@ -474,7 +475,10 @@ static u64 vmac(unsigned char m[], unsig
}
p = be64_to_cpup(out_p + i);
h = vhash(m, mbytes, (u64 *)0, &ctx->__vmac_ctx);
- return p + h;
+ r = p + h;
+ r = le64_to_cpup(&r);
+
+ return r;
}

static int vmac_set_key(unsigned char user_key[], struct vmac_ctx_t *ctx)
@@ -549,10 +553,6 @@ static int vmac_setkey(struct crypto_sha

static int vmac_init(struct shash_desc *pdesc)
{
- struct crypto_shash *parent = pdesc->tfm;
- struct vmac_ctx_t *ctx = crypto_shash_ctx(parent);
-
- memset(&ctx->__vmac_ctx, 0, sizeof(struct vmac_ctx));
return 0;
}



Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
> * Wang, Shane | 2010-02-21 13:32:49 [+0800]:
>
>> --- a/crypto/vmac.c Thu Feb 11 00:45:57 2010 -0800
>> +++ b/crypto/vmac.c Sun Feb 21 02:23:01 2010 -0800
>> @@ -42,6 +42,8 @@ const u64 m63 = UINT64_C(0x7ffffffffff
>> const u64 m63 = UINT64_C(0x7fffffffffffffff); /* 63-bit mask
>> */ const u64 m64 = UINT64_C(0xffffffffffffffff); /* 64-bit mask
>> */ const u64 mpoly = UINT64_C(0x1fffffff1fffffff); /* Poly key mask
>> */ + +#define pe64_to_cpup le64_to_cpup /* Prefer little endian */
>
> Does it mean that I can switch it to be64_to_cpup ?
Yes, per the original vmac algorithm, it is one of the parameters that you can adopt.
But the default is le64 and I use it here.

>
>> @@ -575,6 +572,10 @@ static int vmac_final(struct shash_desc u8
>> nonce[16] = {};
>>
>> mac = vmac(NULL, 0, nonce, NULL, ctx);
>> +
>> + /* set output invariant considering endianness */
>> + mac = le64_to_cpup(&mac);
> So this is the fix. It would look better if you would include this
> swap into vmac() itself. I'm not sure but this is probably causing a
> dereference which could be avoided.
> sparse should catch conversion bugs like this one if you were using
> types likes __be64.
Updated.

>
> Sebastian


Attachments:
vmac_fix.patch (8.51 kB)
vmac_fix.patch

2010-02-21 05:33:32

by Shane Wang

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: RE: [PATCH] to fix vmac test fails on s390

<Updated & Resend>

This patch is to fix the vmac algorithm, add more test cases for vmac, and fix the test failure on some big endian system like s390.

Signed-off-by: Shane Wang <[email protected]>

crypto/testmgr.h | 64 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
crypto/vmac.c | 77 ++++++++++++++++++++++-----------------------
2 files changed, 99 insertions(+), 42 deletions(-)

diff -r 91636f5ce7a2 crypto/testmgr.h
--- a/crypto/testmgr.h Thu Feb 11 00:45:57 2010 -0800
+++ b/crypto/testmgr.h Sun Feb 21 02:23:01 2010 -0800
@@ -1669,17 +1669,73 @@ static struct hash_testvec aes_xcbc128_t
}
};

-#define VMAC_AES_TEST_VECTORS 1
-static char vmac_string[128] = {'\x01', '\x01', '\x01', '\x01',
+#define VMAC_AES_TEST_VECTORS 8
+static char vmac_string1[128] = {'\x01', '\x01', '\x01', '\x01',
'\x02', '\x03', '\x02', '\x02',
'\x02', '\x04', '\x01', '\x07',
'\x04', '\x01', '\x04', '\x03',};
+static char vmac_string2[128] = {'a', 'b', 'c',};
+static char vmac_string3[128] = {'a', 'b', 'c', 'a', 'b', 'c',
+ 'a', 'b', 'c', 'a', 'b', 'c',
+ 'a', 'b', 'c', 'a', 'b', 'c',
+ 'a', 'b', 'c', 'a', 'b', 'c',
+ 'a', 'b', 'c', 'a', 'b', 'c',
+ 'a', 'b', 'c', 'a', 'b', 'c',
+ 'a', 'b', 'c', 'a', 'b', 'c',
+ 'a', 'b', 'c', 'a', 'b', 'c',
+ };
+
static struct hash_testvec aes_vmac128_tv_template[] = {
{
+ .key = "\x00\x01\x02\x03\x04\x05\x06\x07"
+ "\x08\x09\x0a\x0b\x0c\x0d\x0e\x0f",
+ .plaintext = NULL,
+ .digest = "\x07\x58\x80\x35\x77\xa4\x7b\x54",
+ .psize = 0,
+ .ksize = 16,
+ }, {
.key = "\x00\x01\x02\x03\x04\x05\x06\x07"
"\x08\x09\x0a\x0b\x0c\x0d\x0e\x0f",
- .plaintext = vmac_string,
- .digest = "\xcb\xd7\x8a\xfd\xb7\x33\x79\xe7",
+ .plaintext = vmac_string1,
+ .digest = "\xce\xf5\x3c\xd3\xae\x68\x8c\xa1",
+ .psize = 128,
+ .ksize = 16,
+ }, {
+ .key = "\x00\x01\x02\x03\x04\x05\x06\x07"
+ "\x08\x09\x0a\x0b\x0c\x0d\x0e\x0f",
+ .plaintext = vmac_string2,
+ .digest = "\xc9\x27\xb0\x73\x81\xbd\x14\x2d",
+ .psize = 128,
+ .ksize = 16,
+ }, {
+ .key = "\x00\x01\x02\x03\x04\x05\x06\x07"
+ "\x08\x09\x0a\x0b\x0c\x0d\x0e\x0f",
+ .plaintext = vmac_string3,
+ .digest = "\x8d\x1a\x95\x8c\x98\x47\x0b\x19",
+ .psize = 128,
+ .ksize = 16,
+ }, {
+ .key = "abcdefghijklmnop",
+ .plaintext = NULL,
+ .digest = "\x3b\x89\xa1\x26\x9e\x55\x8f\x84",
+ .psize = 0,
+ .ksize = 16,
+ }, {
+ .key = "abcdefghijklmnop",
+ .plaintext = vmac_string1,
+ .digest = "\xab\x5e\xab\xb0\xf6\x8d\x74\xc2",
+ .psize = 128,
+ .ksize = 16,
+ }, {
+ .key = "abcdefghijklmnop",
+ .plaintext = vmac_string2,
+ .digest = "\x11\x15\x68\x42\x3d\x7b\x09\xdf",
+ .psize = 128,
+ .ksize = 16,
+ }, {
+ .key = "abcdefghijklmnop",
+ .plaintext = vmac_string3,
+ .digest = "\x8b\x32\x8f\xe1\xed\x8f\xfa\xd4",
.psize = 128,
.ksize = 16,
},
diff -r 91636f5ce7a2 crypto/vmac.c
--- a/crypto/vmac.c Thu Feb 11 00:45:57 2010 -0800
+++ b/crypto/vmac.c Sun Feb 21 02:23:01 2010 -0800
@@ -42,6 +42,8 @@ const u64 m63 = UINT64_C(0x7ffffffffff
const u64 m63 = UINT64_C(0x7fffffffffffffff); /* 63-bit mask */
const u64 m64 = UINT64_C(0xffffffffffffffff); /* 64-bit mask */
const u64 mpoly = UINT64_C(0x1fffffff1fffffff); /* Poly key mask */
+
+#define pe64_to_cpup le64_to_cpup /* Prefer little endian */

#ifdef __LITTLE_ENDIAN
#define INDEX_HIGH 1
@@ -110,8 +112,8 @@ const u64 mpoly = UINT64_C(0x1fffffff1ff
int i; u64 th, tl; \
rh = rl = 0; \
for (i = 0; i < nw; i += 2) { \
- MUL64(th, tl, le64_to_cpup((mp)+i)+(kp)[i], \
- le64_to_cpup((mp)+i+1)+(kp)[i+1]); \
+ MUL64(th, tl, pe64_to_cpup((mp)+i)+(kp)[i], \
+ pe64_to_cpup((mp)+i+1)+(kp)[i+1]); \
ADD128(rh, rl, th, tl); \
} \
} while (0)
@@ -121,11 +123,11 @@ const u64 mpoly = UINT64_C(0x1fffffff1ff
int i; u64 th, tl; \
rh1 = rl1 = rh = rl = 0; \
for (i = 0; i < nw; i += 2) { \
- MUL64(th, tl, le64_to_cpup((mp)+i)+(kp)[i], \
- le64_to_cpup((mp)+i+1)+(kp)[i+1]); \
+ MUL64(th, tl, pe64_to_cpup((mp)+i)+(kp)[i], \
+ pe64_to_cpup((mp)+i+1)+(kp)[i+1]); \
ADD128(rh, rl, th, tl); \
- MUL64(th, tl, le64_to_cpup((mp)+i)+(kp)[i+2], \
- le64_to_cpup((mp)+i+1)+(kp)[i+3]); \
+ MUL64(th, tl, pe64_to_cpup((mp)+i)+(kp)[i+2], \
+ pe64_to_cpup((mp)+i+1)+(kp)[i+3]); \
ADD128(rh1, rl1, th, tl); \
} \
} while (0)
@@ -136,17 +138,17 @@ const u64 mpoly = UINT64_C(0x1fffffff1ff
int i; u64 th, tl; \
rh = rl = 0; \
for (i = 0; i < nw; i += 8) { \
- MUL64(th, tl, le64_to_cpup((mp)+i)+(kp)[i], \
- le64_to_cpup((mp)+i+1)+(kp)[i+1]); \
+ MUL64(th, tl, pe64_to_cpup((mp)+i)+(kp)[i], \
+ pe64_to_cpup((mp)+i+1)+(kp)[i+1]); \
ADD128(rh, rl, th, tl); \
- MUL64(th, tl, le64_to_cpup((mp)+i+2)+(kp)[i+2], \
- le64_to_cpup((mp)+i+3)+(kp)[i+3]); \
+ MUL64(th, tl, pe64_to_cpup((mp)+i+2)+(kp)[i+2], \
+ pe64_to_cpup((mp)+i+3)+(kp)[i+3]); \
ADD128(rh, rl, th, tl); \
- MUL64(th, tl, le64_to_cpup((mp)+i+4)+(kp)[i+4], \
- le64_to_cpup((mp)+i+5)+(kp)[i+5]); \
+ MUL64(th, tl, pe64_to_cpup((mp)+i+4)+(kp)[i+4], \
+ pe64_to_cpup((mp)+i+5)+(kp)[i+5]); \
ADD128(rh, rl, th, tl); \
- MUL64(th, tl, le64_to_cpup((mp)+i+6)+(kp)[i+6], \
- le64_to_cpup((mp)+i+7)+(kp)[i+7]); \
+ MUL64(th, tl, pe64_to_cpup((mp)+i+6)+(kp)[i+6], \
+ pe64_to_cpup((mp)+i+7)+(kp)[i+7]); \
ADD128(rh, rl, th, tl); \
} \
} while (0)
@@ -156,29 +158,29 @@ const u64 mpoly = UINT64_C(0x1fffffff1ff
int i; u64 th, tl; \
rh1 = rl1 = rh = rl = 0; \
for (i = 0; i < nw; i += 8) { \
- MUL64(th, tl, le64_to_cpup((mp)+i)+(kp)[i], \
- le64_to_cpup((mp)+i+1)+(kp)[i+1]); \
+ MUL64(th, tl, pe64_to_cpup((mp)+i)+(kp)[i], \
+ pe64_to_cpup((mp)+i+1)+(kp)[i+1]); \
ADD128(rh, rl, th, tl); \
- MUL64(th, tl, le64_to_cpup((mp)+i)+(kp)[i+2], \
- le64_to_cpup((mp)+i+1)+(kp)[i+3]); \
+ MUL64(th, tl, pe64_to_cpup((mp)+i)+(kp)[i+2], \
+ pe64_to_cpup((mp)+i+1)+(kp)[i+3]); \
ADD128(rh1, rl1, th, tl); \
- MUL64(th, tl, le64_to_cpup((mp)+i+2)+(kp)[i+2], \
- le64_to_cpup((mp)+i+3)+(kp)[i+3]); \
+ MUL64(th, tl, pe64_to_cpup((mp)+i+2)+(kp)[i+2], \
+ pe64_to_cpup((mp)+i+3)+(kp)[i+3]); \
ADD128(rh, rl, th, tl); \
- MUL64(th, tl, le64_to_cpup((mp)+i+2)+(kp)[i+4], \
- le64_to_cpup((mp)+i+3)+(kp)[i+5]); \
+ MUL64(th, tl, pe64_to_cpup((mp)+i+2)+(kp)[i+4], \
+ pe64_to_cpup((mp)+i+3)+(kp)[i+5]); \
ADD128(rh1, rl1, th, tl); \
- MUL64(th, tl, le64_to_cpup((mp)+i+4)+(kp)[i+4], \
- le64_to_cpup((mp)+i+5)+(kp)[i+5]); \
+ MUL64(th, tl, pe64_to_cpup((mp)+i+4)+(kp)[i+4], \
+ pe64_to_cpup((mp)+i+5)+(kp)[i+5]); \
ADD128(rh, rl, th, tl); \
- MUL64(th, tl, le64_to_cpup((mp)+i+4)+(kp)[i+6], \
- le64_to_cpup((mp)+i+5)+(kp)[i+7]); \
+ MUL64(th, tl, pe64_to_cpup((mp)+i+4)+(kp)[i+6], \
+ pe64_to_cpup((mp)+i+5)+(kp)[i+7]); \
ADD128(rh1, rl1, th, tl); \
- MUL64(th, tl, le64_to_cpup((mp)+i+6)+(kp)[i+6], \
- le64_to_cpup((mp)+i+7)+(kp)[i+7]); \
+ MUL64(th, tl, pe64_to_cpup((mp)+i+6)+(kp)[i+6], \
+ pe64_to_cpup((mp)+i+7)+(kp)[i+7]); \
ADD128(rh, rl, th, tl); \
- MUL64(th, tl, le64_to_cpup((mp)+i+6)+(kp)[i+8], \
- le64_to_cpup((mp)+i+7)+(kp)[i+9]); \
+ MUL64(th, tl, pe64_to_cpup((mp)+i+6)+(kp)[i+8], \
+ pe64_to_cpup((mp)+i+7)+(kp)[i+9]); \
ADD128(rh1, rl1, th, tl); \
} \
} while (0)
@@ -216,8 +218,8 @@ const u64 mpoly = UINT64_C(0x1fffffff1ff
int i; \
rh = rl = t = 0; \
for (i = 0; i < nw; i += 2) { \
- t1 = le64_to_cpup(mp+i) + kp[i]; \
- t2 = le64_to_cpup(mp+i+1) + kp[i+1]; \
+ t1 = pe64_to_cpup(mp+i) + kp[i]; \
+ t2 = pe64_to_cpup(mp+i+1) + kp[i+1]; \
m2 = MUL32(t1 >> 32, t2); \
m1 = MUL32(t1, t2 >> 32); \
ADD128(rh, rl, MUL32(t1 >> 32, t2 >> 32), \
@@ -322,8 +324,7 @@ static void vhash_abort(struct vmac_ctx
ctx->first_block_processed = 0;
}

-static u64 l3hash(u64 p1, u64 p2,
- u64 k1, u64 k2, u64 len)
+static u64 l3hash(u64 p1, u64 p2, u64 k1, u64 k2, u64 len)
{
u64 rh, rl, t, z = 0;

@@ -549,10 +550,6 @@ static int vmac_setkey(struct crypto_sha

static int vmac_init(struct shash_desc *pdesc)
{
- struct crypto_shash *parent = pdesc->tfm;
- struct vmac_ctx_t *ctx = crypto_shash_ctx(parent);
-
- memset(&ctx->__vmac_ctx, 0, sizeof(struct vmac_ctx));
return 0;
}

@@ -575,6 +572,10 @@ static int vmac_final(struct shash_desc
u8 nonce[16] = {};

mac = vmac(NULL, 0, nonce, NULL, ctx);
+
+ /* set output invariant considering endianness */
+ mac = le64_to_cpup(&mac);
+
memcpy(out, &mac, sizeof(vmac_t));
memset(&mac, 0, sizeof(vmac_t));
memset(&ctx->__vmac_ctx, 0, sizeof(struct vmac_ctx));


Attachments:
vmac_fix.patch (8.36 kB)
vmac_fix.patch

2010-03-02 13:57:24

by Herbert Xu

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH] to fix vmac test fails on s390

On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 11:21:04AM +0800, Wang, Shane wrote:
>
> @@ -474,7 +475,10 @@ static u64 vmac(unsigned char m[], unsig
> }
> p = be64_to_cpup(out_p + i);
> h = vhash(m, mbytes, (u64 *)0, &ctx->__vmac_ctx);
> - return p + h;
> + r = p + h;
> + r = le64_to_cpup(&r);
> +
> + return r;

Is there any reason why we don't simply do

return le64_to_cpu(p + h);

Cheers,
--
Visit Openswan at http://www.openswan.org/
Email: Herbert Xu ~{PmV>HI~} <[email protected]>
Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/
PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt

2010-03-16 05:26:13

by Shane Wang

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: RE: [PATCH] to fix vmac test fails on s390

That should be simpler and better.

Thanks.
Shane

-----Original Message-----
From: Herbert Xu [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: 2010??3??2?? 21:57
To: Wang, Shane
Cc: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior; Jan Glauber; Cihula, Joseph; linux-crypto
Subject: Re: [PATCH] to fix vmac test fails on s390

On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 11:21:04AM +0800, Wang, Shane wrote:
>
> @@ -474,7 +475,10 @@ static u64 vmac(unsigned char m[], unsig
> }
> p = be64_to_cpup(out_p + i);
> h = vhash(m, mbytes, (u64 *)0, &ctx->__vmac_ctx);
> - return p + h;
> + r = p + h;
> + r = le64_to_cpup(&r);
> +
> + return r;

Is there any reason why we don't simply do

return le64_to_cpu(p + h);

Cheers,
--
Visit Openswan at http://www.openswan.org/
Email: Herbert Xu ~{PmV>HI~} <[email protected]>
Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/
PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt

2010-03-16 05:31:31

by Herbert Xu

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH] to fix vmac test fails on s390

On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 01:25:54PM +0800, Wang, Shane wrote:
> That should be simpler and better.

OK can you please resubmit the patch?

Thanks,
--
Visit Openswan at http://www.openswan.org/
Email: Herbert Xu ~{PmV>HI~} <[email protected]>
Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/
PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt