From: Herbert Xu Subject: Re: [CRYPTO] is it really optimized ? Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2007 23:42:01 +1000 Message-ID: References: <20070417130431.GA8685@2ka.mipt.ru> Cc: francis.moro@gmail.com, herbert@gondor.apana.org.au, helge.hafting@aitel.hist.no, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org To: johnpol@2ka.mipt.ru (Evgeniy Polyakov) Return-path: Received: from rhun.apana.org.au ([64.62.148.172]:1268 "EHLO arnor.apana.org.au" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754328AbXDQNmH (ORCPT ); Tue, 17 Apr 2007 09:42:07 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20070417130431.GA8685@2ka.mipt.ru> Sender: linux-crypto-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-crypto.vger.kernel.org Evgeniy Polyakov wrote: > >> OK, I tried to cook up something very simple. Since I don't know this >> code, please be indulgent when reading the following patch ;) > > Which means that after one has loaded ecryptfs module it can not use > ipsec and dm-crypt if there is only one crypto algo registered... Yep. We don't need such a flag anyway. All we need is a way to tweak the priority and Bob's your uncle. Cheers, -- Visit Openswan at http://www.openswan.org/ Email: Herbert Xu ~{PmV>HI~} Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/ PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt