From: Herbert Xu Subject: Re: [PATCH] [XFRM] Camellia: fixed to add compat name for Camellia. Date: Wed, 16 May 2007 19:18:56 +1000 Message-ID: <20070516091856.GA21695@gondor.apana.org.au> References: <20061018.161510.796986352.takamiya@po.ntts.co.jp> <20061018.161749.782295638.takamiya@po.ntts.co.jp> <20070516.165231.783376564.takamiya@po.ntts.co.jp> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org, davem@davemloft.net, camellia-oss@sec.ms.ntts.co.jp To: Noriaki TAKAMIYA Return-path: Received: from rhun.apana.org.au ([64.62.148.172]:4049 "EHLO arnor.apana.org.au" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1758094AbXEPJTP (ORCPT ); Wed, 16 May 2007 05:19:15 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20070516.165231.783376564.takamiya@po.ntts.co.jp> Sender: linux-crypto-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-crypto.vger.kernel.org On Wed, May 16, 2007 at 04:52:31PM +0900, Noriaki TAKAMIYA wrote: > > I checked the linux-2.6.21.y.git and linux-2.6.git tree. > > The patch I sent had the compat name for "camellia", but applied > code doesn't have it. Actually this was deliberate. The compat name only exists so that existing users aren't broken. New users should always configure it with the full name, that is, "cbc(camellia)". Of course, af_key users will continue to use numerical IDs as they currently do. Is there a case where this is difficult? Cheers, -- Visit Openswan at http://www.openswan.org/ Email: Herbert Xu ~{PmV>HI~} Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/ PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt