From: Sebastian Siewior Subject: Re: {twofish,aes}-{x86_64,i586} versus C implementations Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2007 23:09:47 +0200 Message-ID: <20070920210947.GA27950@Chamillionaire.breakpoint.cc> References: <200708200234.25620.ak@suse.de> <20070820101618.GE16680@bingen.suse.de> <20070820120605.GA13163@gondor.apana.org.au> <20070820130639.GN16680@bingen.suse.de> <20070902224226.GA22869@Chamillionaire.breakpoint.cc> <20070919122943.GD19866@gondor.apana.org.au> <20070919214652.GC20997@Chamillionaire.breakpoint.cc> <20070920002058.GA26848@gondor.apana.org.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-15 Cc: Andi Kleen , linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org To: Herbert Xu Return-path: Received: from Chamillionaire.breakpoint.cc ([85.10.199.196]:43104 "EHLO Chamillionaire.breakpoint.cc" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752325AbXITVJx (ORCPT ); Thu, 20 Sep 2007 17:09:53 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20070920002058.GA26848@gondor.apana.org.au> Sender: linux-crypto-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-crypto.vger.kernel.org * Herbert Xu | 2007-09-20 08:20:58 [+0800]: >So that the generic C version can actually be tested on x86. >We don't want it to bit-rot which would make non-x86 2nd-class >citizens. Okey. I try to post something what you might like in the new few days. >Cheers, Sebastian