From: Sebastian Siewior Subject: Re: [PATCH] [crypto] load the SHA1[1|256] module by an alias Date: Mon, 8 Oct 2007 13:30:20 +0200 Message-ID: <20071008113020.GB31712@Chamillionaire.breakpoint.cc> References: <200708200234.25620.ak@suse.de> <20070820101618.GE16680@bingen.suse.de> <20070820120605.GA13163@gondor.apana.org.au> <20070930124239.GB24811@Chamillionaire.breakpoint.cc> <20071003073522.GA7285@gondor.apana.org.au> <20071004083512.GA11305@Chamillionaire.breakpoint.cc> <1191842723.7760.3.camel@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-15 Cc: Herbert Xu , linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org To: Jan Glauber Return-path: Received: from Chamillionaire.breakpoint.cc ([85.10.199.196]:42258 "EHLO Chamillionaire.breakpoint.cc" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752574AbXJHLaW (ORCPT ); Mon, 8 Oct 2007 07:30:22 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1191842723.7760.3.camel@localhost.localdomain> Sender: linux-crypto-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-crypto.vger.kernel.org * Jan Glauber | 2007-10-08 13:25:23 [+0200]: >Hi Sebastian, Hi Jan, good to see you back :) >what about SHA-512? Should that not also be renamed to sha512_generic.c ? We could do it, but I haven't seen a HW implementation yet. If your new CPU has an opcode for this, we could rename it than :) > >--Jan Sebastian