From: Herbert Xu Subject: Re: [RFC] consider keysize in algorithm selection Date: Thu, 11 Oct 2007 21:01:40 +0800 Message-ID: <20071011130140.GA20363@gondor.apana.org.au> References: <20071010164400.GA19471@Chamillionaire.breakpoint.cc> <20071011114700.GA17801@gondor.apana.org.au> <20071011124314.GA28993@Chamillionaire.breakpoint.cc> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii To: linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org Return-path: Received: from rhun.apana.org.au ([64.62.148.172]:4790 "EHLO arnor.apana.org.au" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753280AbXJKNBn (ORCPT ); Thu, 11 Oct 2007 09:01:43 -0400 Received: from gondolin.me.apana.org.au ([192.168.0.6] ident=mail) by arnor.apana.org.au with esmtp (Exim 4.50 #1 (Debian)) id 1IfxfZ-0001WO-9I for ; Thu, 11 Oct 2007 23:01:41 +1000 Received: from herbert by gondolin.me.apana.org.au with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 1IfxfY-0005J0-00 for ; Thu, 11 Oct 2007 21:01:40 +0800 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20071011124314.GA28993@Chamillionaire.breakpoint.cc> Sender: linux-crypto-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-crypto.vger.kernel.org On Thu, Oct 11, 2007 at 02:43:14PM +0200, Sebastian Siewior wrote: > > >In other words, let's make geode-aes use the padlock-sha method > >and just fall back to a lower-priority AES algorithm if it sees > >a key size that it can't handle. > geode and s390 :) Are you sure about s390? I can't find a key size that it can't handle. > I'm currently digging in geode's code, it seems that there is bug > hiding somewhere. I wouldn't be surprised if there were two of them hiding there :) Cheers, -- Visit Openswan at http://www.openswan.org/ Email: Herbert Xu ~{PmV>HI~} Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/ PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt