From: Herbert Xu Subject: Re: [RFC] consider keysize in algorithm selection Date: Thu, 11 Oct 2007 21:44:26 +0800 Message-ID: <20071011134426.GA21587@gondor.apana.org.au> References: <20071010164400.GA19471@Chamillionaire.breakpoint.cc> <20071011114700.GA17801@gondor.apana.org.au> <20071011124314.GA28993@Chamillionaire.breakpoint.cc> <20071011130140.GA20363@gondor.apana.org.au> <20071011132848.GB28993@Chamillionaire.breakpoint.cc> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii To: linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org, Jan Glauber Return-path: Received: from rhun.apana.org.au ([64.62.148.172]:1157 "EHLO arnor.apana.org.au" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751820AbXJKNoh (ORCPT ); Thu, 11 Oct 2007 09:44:37 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20071011132848.GB28993@Chamillionaire.breakpoint.cc> Sender: linux-crypto-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-crypto.vger.kernel.org On Thu, Oct 11, 2007 at 03:28:48PM +0200, Sebastian Siewior wrote: > > It is possible that future machines will support 192 and 256 key sizes > as well but what do I know, I don't work there :) Anyway even if they > support all key sizes at later time you have still those who don't. On > the other hand the customers maybe don't even care / use it :) OK they'll get the fallback treatment then :) Cheers, -- Visit Openswan at http://www.openswan.org/ Email: Herbert Xu ~{PmV>HI~} Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/ PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt