From: Noriaki TAKAMIYA Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/5] camellia: de-unrolling, 64bit-ization Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2007 15:07:02 +0900 (JST) Message-ID: <20071113.150702.628183529.takamiya@po.ntts.co.jp> References: <20071106142314.GE24423@gondor.apana.org.au> <200711071322.52630.vda.linux@googlemail.com> <20071108133019.GD17186@gondor.apana.org.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=iso-2022-jp Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: vda.linux@googlemail.com, linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org To: herbert@gondor.apana.org.au Return-path: Received: from mail2.ics.ntts.co.jp ([202.32.24.42]:53516 "EHLO mail2.ics.ntts.co.jp" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750820AbXKMGIE (ORCPT ); Tue, 13 Nov 2007 01:08:04 -0500 In-Reply-To: <20071108133019.GD17186@gondor.apana.org.au> Sender: linux-crypto-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-crypto.vger.kernel.org Hi, Sorry for late reply >> Thu, 8 Nov 2007 21:30:20 +0800 頃、 >> [Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/5] camellia: de-unrolling, 64bit-ization] において、 >> Herbert Xu さんが書きました.... > On Wed, Nov 07, 2007 at 01:22:52PM +0000, Denys Vlasenko wrote: > > > > *I* am happy with 5% speed sacrifice. I'm afraid other people won't be. > > I'd like to hear the opinion of the author. > > Takamiya-san, what do you think about this change? For IPsec processing, I think performance is important. If this fix improves the performance, it is acceptable. But, there are many duplicate decralations between camellia.c and camellia_64.c... (e.g., CAMELLIA_MIN_KEY_SIZE and so on) Regards, -- Noriaki TAKAMIYA