From: David Miller Subject: Re: [camellia-oss:00952] Re: [PATCH 5/5] camellia: de-unrolling, 64bit-ization Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2007 19:49:52 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <20071113.194952.229187981.davem@davemloft.net> References: <200711131534.33521.vda.linux@googlemail.com> <20071113.174104.224925773.davem@davemloft.net> <200711131947.09040.vda.linux@googlemail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: takamiya@po.ntts.co.jp, herbert@gondor.apana.org.au, linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org To: vda.linux@googlemail.com Return-path: Received: from 74-93-104-97-Washington.hfc.comcastbusiness.net ([74.93.104.97]:39322 "EHLO sunset.davemloft.net" rhost-flags-OK-FAIL-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1757357AbXKNDtx (ORCPT ); Tue, 13 Nov 2007 22:49:53 -0500 In-Reply-To: <200711131947.09040.vda.linux@googlemail.com> Sender: linux-crypto-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-crypto.vger.kernel.org From: Denys Vlasenko Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2007 19:47:08 -0700 > If CONFIG_CC_OPTIMIZE_FOR_SIZE is not an acceptable method, > do you have other ideas? Look at ways to make the code run faster without loop unrolling?