From: Herbert Xu Subject: Re: [PATCH] [CRYPTO] cast6: inline bloat-- Date: Sat, 12 Jan 2008 13:56:45 +1100 Message-ID: <20080112025645.GA1590@gondor.apana.org.au> References: <20080110092555.GB25076@one.firstfloor.org> <20080110092746.GA11613@gondor.apana.org.au> <20080110133529.GA13851@Chamillionaire.breakpoint.cc> <20080110154650.GA29453@one.firstfloor.org> <20080112000937.GA23721@Chamillionaire.breakpoint.cc> <20080112024741.GA27661@one.firstfloor.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Ilpo J?rvinen , linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org To: Andi Kleen Return-path: Received: from rhun.apana.org.au ([64.62.148.172]:3067 "EHLO arnor.apana.org.au" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754101AbYALC4x (ORCPT ); Fri, 11 Jan 2008 21:56:53 -0500 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20080112024741.GA27661@one.firstfloor.org> Sender: linux-crypto-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Sat, Jan 12, 2008 at 03:47:41AM +0100, Andi Kleen wrote: > > The inline and not inline performance is quite similar. I guess the > > little difference here and there is due to some random ctx switches (I > > Are you sure you were not just IO bound? It would have been better > to test in memory (e.g. using ramfs or just some direct test client) He tested with tcrypt which is definitely not IO bound. Cheers, -- Visit Openswan at http://www.openswan.org/ Email: Herbert Xu ~{PmV>HI~} Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/ PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt