From: Sebastian Siewior Subject: Re: [RFC] padlock aes, unification of setkey() Date: Sun, 24 Feb 2008 13:51:17 +0100 Message-ID: <20080224125117.GA17076@Chamillionaire.breakpoint.cc> References: <1203850864-16681-1-git-send-email-sebastian@breakpoint.cc> <47C15AEC.5040705@the2masters.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-15 Cc: linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org To: Stefan Hellermann Return-path: Received: from Chamillionaire.breakpoint.cc ([85.10.199.196]:40030 "EHLO Chamillionaire.breakpoint.cc" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754673AbYBXMvT (ORCPT ); Sun, 24 Feb 2008 07:51:19 -0500 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <47C15AEC.5040705@the2masters.de> Sender: linux-crypto-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: * Stefan Hellermann | 2008-02-24 12:54:20 [+0100]: >Hello, Hello, >I'm got my Via Epia SN Board a few days ago and could test everything related to the >padlock engine, I'm especially interested in the aes-{lrw,xts} combo, this doesn't work at Cool, >the moment (last tested with 2.6.25-rc1). Could you be a little more specific on "it doesn't work"? Do you pass the tcrypt test at least? Does it* work without the HW acceleration? >Cheers, >Stefan *: it means a dm-crypt encrypted partition I guess. Sebastian