From: Herbert Xu Subject: Re: [RFC] [crypto] padlock-aes loadkey ondemand Date: Wed, 2 Apr 2008 14:31:52 +0800 Message-ID: <20080402063152.GA7258@gondor.apana.org.au> References: <20080328223333.GB24018@Chamillionaire.breakpoint.cc> <20080402062659.GA32234@Chamillionaire.breakpoint.cc> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: stefan@the2masters.de, linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org To: Sebastian Siewior Return-path: Received: from rhun.apana.org.au ([64.62.148.172]:59220 "EHLO arnor.apana.org.au" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752925AbYDBGb7 (ORCPT ); Wed, 2 Apr 2008 02:31:59 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20080402062659.GA32234@Chamillionaire.breakpoint.cc> Sender: linux-crypto-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Wed, Apr 02, 2008 at 08:26:59AM +0200, Sebastian Siewior wrote: > > In that case we are safe aren't we? If we get preempted and user > space is invoked (or any other kernel thread) then the EFLAGS of the > task are restored what sets EFLAGS:30 to zero. Or did I misinterprete > it? Good point. It should be fine then. Cheers, -- Visit Openswan at http://www.openswan.org/ Email: Herbert Xu ~{PmV>HI~} Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/ PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt