From: Stefan Hellermann Subject: Re: [RFC] [crypto] padlock-aes loadkey ondemand Date: Wed, 02 Apr 2008 17:48:33 +0200 Message-ID: <47F3AAD1.90406@the2masters.de> References: <20080328223333.GB24018@Chamillionaire.breakpoint.cc> <47EFE3F6.4060704@the2masters.de> <20080330210152.GA25597@Chamillionaire.breakpoint.cc> <47F28136.3080502@the2masters.de> <20080402064419.GC32234@Chamillionaire.breakpoint.cc> <20080402065015.GA7421@gondor.apana.org.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Sebastian Siewior , linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org To: Herbert Xu Return-path: Received: from smtp11.unit.tiscali.de ([213.205.33.47]:34475 "EHLO smtp11.unit.tiscali.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755196AbYDBPt0 (ORCPT ); Wed, 2 Apr 2008 11:49:26 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20080402065015.GA7421@gondor.apana.org.au> Sender: linux-crypto-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Herbert Xu schrieb: > On Wed, Apr 02, 2008 at 08:44:19AM +0200, Sebastian Siewior wrote: >> Herbert: I was going to Cc you and ask if the speed improvements are >> okey / enough to consider this patch for inclusion but I see now that >> you found this thread on your own :) Do you want me to form a patch? > > Yes please! BTW, can VIA do SMP? If so then we'll need some code > to deal with that and if not, we should add a run-time check to > fail the module insertion if ever such a beast should arise. Till now VIA has no SMP and nothing planed (as far as I know, I'm not a VIA guy). There next gen processors will be called isaiah, without smp but with 64bit and lots of other features ( http://www.via.com.tw/en/products/processors/isaiah-arch/ ) Cheers Stefan > > Cheers,