From: Sebastian Siewior Subject: Re: [PATCH -mm crypto] AES: x86_64 asm implementation optimization Date: Fri, 25 Apr 2008 09:12:58 +0200 Message-ID: <20080425071258.GA4460@Chamillionaire.breakpoint.cc> References: <1207723262.18313.37.camel@caritas-dev.intel.com> <20080416073108.GA13494@Chamillionaire.breakpoint.cc> <1208333949.4322.5.camel@caritas-dev.intel.com> <20080416184016.GA21365@Chamillionaire.breakpoint.cc> <1208403403.4322.27.camel@caritas-dev.intel.com> <20080423223221.GB16683@Chamillionaire.breakpoint.cc> <1209093077.20936.24.camel@caritas-dev.intel.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-15 Cc: Herbert Xu , "Adam J. Richter" , akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org, mingo@elte.hu, tglx@linutronix.de To: "Huang, Ying" Return-path: Received: from Chamillionaire.breakpoint.cc ([85.10.199.196]:53269 "EHLO Chamillionaire.breakpoint.cc" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753351AbYDYHNK (ORCPT ); Fri, 25 Apr 2008 03:13:10 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1209093077.20936.24.camel@caritas-dev.intel.com> Sender: linux-crypto-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: * Huang, Ying | 2008-04-25 11:11:17 [+0800]: >Hi, Sebastian, Hi Huang, >So I think the reason maybe the read/write port throughput of CPU. Ah so it is just a local problem you say? I may get my fingers on another amd box.... >I changed the patches to group the read or write together instead of >interleaving. Can you help me to test these new patches? The new patches >is attached with the mail. Sure. >Best Regards, >Huang Ying Sebastian