From: "Huang, Ying" Subject: Re: [PATCH -mm crypto] AES: x86_64 asm implementation optimization Date: Fri, 25 Apr 2008 15:21:27 +0800 Message-ID: <1209108087.20936.30.camel@caritas-dev.intel.com> References: <1207723262.18313.37.camel@caritas-dev.intel.com> <20080416073108.GA13494@Chamillionaire.breakpoint.cc> <1208333949.4322.5.camel@caritas-dev.intel.com> <20080416184016.GA21365@Chamillionaire.breakpoint.cc> <1208403403.4322.27.camel@caritas-dev.intel.com> <20080423223221.GB16683@Chamillionaire.breakpoint.cc> <1209093077.20936.24.camel@caritas-dev.intel.com> <20080425071258.GA4460@Chamillionaire.breakpoint.cc> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Herbert Xu , "Adam J. Richter" , akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org, mingo@elte.hu, tglx@linutronix.de To: Sebastian Siewior Return-path: Received: from mga02.intel.com ([134.134.136.20]:49782 "EHLO mga02.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753156AbYDYHQh (ORCPT ); Fri, 25 Apr 2008 03:16:37 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20080425071258.GA4460@Chamillionaire.breakpoint.cc> Sender: linux-crypto-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Hi, Sebastian, On Fri, 2008-04-25 at 09:12 +0200, Sebastian Siewior wrote: > * Huang, Ying | 2008-04-25 11:11:17 [+0800]: > > >Hi, Sebastian, > Hi Huang, > > >So I think the reason maybe the read/write port throughput of CPU. > Ah so it is just a local problem you say? I may get my fingers on > another amd box.... I mean the read/write port design difference between CPU micro-architecture. It is not a local problem. Sorry for my English. > >I changed the patches to group the read or write together instead of > >interleaving. Can you help me to test these new patches? The new patches > >is attached with the mail. > Sure. Thank you very much. Best Regards, Huang Ying