From: dean gaudet Subject: Re: [PATCH -mm crypto] AES: x86_64 asm implementation optimization Date: Sat, 3 May 2008 23:25:27 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: References: <1207723262.18313.37.camel@caritas-dev.intel.com> <20080416073108.GA13494@Chamillionaire.breakpoint.cc> <1208333949.4322.5.camel@caritas-dev.intel.com> <20080416184016.GA21365@Chamillionaire.breakpoint.cc> <1208403403.4322.27.camel@caritas-dev.intel.com> <20080423223221.GB16683@Chamillionaire.breakpoint.cc> <1209093077.20936.24.camel@caritas-dev.intel.com> <20080429221225.GA5280@Chamillionaire.breakpoint.cc> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Cc: "Huang, Ying" , Herbert Xu , "Adam J. Richter" , akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org, mingo@elte.hu, tglx@linutronix.de To: Sebastian Siewior Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20080429221225.GA5280@Chamillionaire.breakpoint.cc> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-crypto.vger.kernel.org one of the more important details in evaluating these changes would be the family/model/stepping of the processors being microbenchmarked... could you folks include /proc/cpuinfo with the results? also -- please drop the #define for R16 to %rsp ... it obfuscates more than it helps anything. thanks -dean On Wed, 30 Apr 2008, Sebastian Siewior wrote: > * Huang, Ying | 2008-04-25 11:11:17 [+0800]: > > >Hi, Sebastian, > Hi Huang, > > sorry for the delay. > > >I changed the patches to group the read or write together instead of > >interleaving. Can you help me to test these new patches? The new patches > >is attached with the mail. > The new results are attached. > > > > >Best Regards, > >Huang Ying > > Sebastian >