From: Sebastian Siewior Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] crypto: rmd128: make it work on my prefered architecture Date: Wed, 21 May 2008 09:20:59 +0200 Message-ID: <20080521072059.GB5290@Chamillionaire.breakpoint.cc> References: <20080517095625.GA17878@gondor.apana.org.au> <20080520.194723.268247612.davem@davemloft.net> <20080521070954.GA5290@Chamillionaire.breakpoint.cc> <20080521.001142.114608182.davem@davemloft.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-15 Cc: herbert@gondor.apana.org.au, linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org, rueegsegger@swiss-it.ch To: David Miller Return-path: Received: from Chamillionaire.breakpoint.cc ([85.10.199.196]:36455 "EHLO Chamillionaire.breakpoint.cc" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756361AbYEUHVE (ORCPT ); Wed, 21 May 2008 03:21:04 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20080521.001142.114608182.davem@davemloft.net> Sender: linux-crypto-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: * David Miller | 2008-05-21 00:11:42 [-0700]: >From: Sebastian Siewior >Date: Wed, 21 May 2008 09:09:54 +0200 > >> That was, what I expected as well but the numbers were different. I >> checked the assembly code and I had the le loads but more code. I will >> check with different compiler maybe it will get better here as well. > >Your particular powerpc cpu might also do these loads more slowly >than other ones. Yes, that could be case. However a "manual" swap has three opcodes here, the le load has one. I should not end up with more code in the latter cases hould I? Sebastian