From: Herbert Xu Subject: Re: [dm-devel] Desynchronizing dm-raid1 Date: Thu, 22 May 2008 10:42:25 +0800 Message-ID: <20080522024225.GA28400@gondor.apana.org.au> References: <20080513033822.GA9604@gondor.apana.org.au> <20080514011457.GB18728@gondor.apana.org.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Alasdair G Kergon , linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org, dm-devel@redhat.com, malahal@us.ibm.com To: Mikulas Patocka Return-path: Received: from rhun.apana.org.au ([64.62.148.172]:41827 "EHLO arnor.apana.org.au" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753023AbYEVCma (ORCPT ); Wed, 21 May 2008 22:42:30 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-crypto-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Wed, May 21, 2008 at 10:18:43PM -0400, Mikulas Patocka wrote: > > All the ciphers comply, so the bug is only a theroretical issue (but I > didn't check assembler versions --- they should be checked by the person > who wrote them, assembler is write-only language). Since every current algorithm sets the flag could you invert its sense? Sorry to have to do this to you :) Thanks, -- Visit Openswan at http://www.openswan.org/ Email: Herbert Xu ~{PmV>HI~} Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/ PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt