From: Herbert Xu Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] [XFRM] xfrm_algo: correct usage of RIPEMD-160 Date: Mon, 2 Jun 2008 17:04:56 +1000 Message-ID: <20080602070456.GA21479@gondor.apana.org.au> References: <1212340578-15574-1-git-send-email-rueegsegger@swiss-it.ch> <1212340578-15574-2-git-send-email-rueegsegger@swiss-it.ch> <20080602065132.GA11128@Chamillionaire.breakpoint.cc> <48439AF0.30508@swiss-it.ch> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Sebastian Siewior , linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org To: Adrian-Ken Rueegsegger Return-path: Received: from rhun.apana.org.au ([64.62.148.172]:57101 "EHLO arnor.apana.org.au" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755347AbYFBHFE (ORCPT ); Mon, 2 Jun 2008 03:05:04 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <48439AF0.30508@swiss-it.ch> Sender: linux-crypto-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Mon, Jun 02, 2008 at 09:02:08AM +0200, Adrian-Ken Rueegsegger wrote: > > Yes, that would be the other way to do it. Is there a preference or specific reason > for renaming the hash algorithm than changing the reference to the algorithm? I think the rmd name is fine. The existing entry in IPsec has never worked (since we didn't have the implementation) so it isn't an issue. Cheers, -- Visit Openswan at http://www.openswan.org/ Email: Herbert Xu ~{PmV>HI~} Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/ PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt