From: Herbert Xu Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/6] crypto: talitos - fix GFP flag usage Date: Thu, 17 Jul 2008 20:17:58 +0800 Message-ID: <20080717121758.GA25267@gondor.apana.org.au> References: <20080716182215.36c1bd11.kim.phillips@freescale.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Kim Phillips , linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev To: Kumar Gala Return-path: Received: from rhun.apana.org.au ([64.62.148.172]:50665 "EHLO arnor.apana.org.au" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1758936AbYGQMSF (ORCPT ); Thu, 17 Jul 2008 08:18:05 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-crypto-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Wed, Jul 16, 2008 at 06:33:45PM -0500, Kumar Gala wrote: > > On Jul 16, 2008, at 6:22 PM, Kim Phillips wrote: > > >use GFP_ATOMIC when necessary; use atomic_t when allocating > >submit_count. > > why? You mean why are atomics required? Yes that is a good question. Kim? Cheers, -- Visit Openswan at http://www.openswan.org/ Email: Herbert Xu ~{PmV>HI~} Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/ PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt