From: Linus Torvalds Subject: Re: Crypto Update for 2.6.28 Date: Wed, 24 Dec 2008 14:32:28 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: References: <20080421024306.GA6813@gondor.apana.org.au> <20080714121403.GA28523@gondor.apana.org.au> <20081010070918.GA28057@gondor.apana.org.au> <20081011021357.GB3685@gondor.apana.org.au> <20081210123524.GA11696@gondor.apana.org.au> <20081224222045.GA488@gondor.apana.org.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Cc: "David S. Miller" , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Linux Crypto Mailing List To: Herbert Xu Return-path: Received: from smtp1.linux-foundation.org ([140.211.169.13]:32818 "EHLO smtp1.linux-foundation.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751243AbYLXWdK (ORCPT ); Wed, 24 Dec 2008 17:33:10 -0500 In-Reply-To: <20081224222045.GA488@gondor.apana.org.au> Sender: linux-crypto-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Thu, 25 Dec 2008, Herbert Xu wrote: > > A regression has been reported where the new algorithm testing > infrastructure may cause the optimised versions of AES to fail > when it's built into the kernel (as opposed to as a module). Can't we just get rid of that stupid testing infrastructure, or make it a module-only thing? I refuse to pull a 1000+ line patch for something like this, especially this late. It's insane. Linus