From: Pekka Enberg Subject: Re: [PATCH] Export symbol ksize() Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2009 17:55:04 +0200 Message-ID: <1234454104.28812.175.camel@penberg-laptop> References: <1234272104-10211-1-git-send-email-kirill@shutemov.name> <84144f020902100535i4d626a9fj8cbb305120cf332a@mail.gmail.com> <20090210134651.GA5115@epbyminw8406h.minsk.epam.com> <20090212104349.GA13859@gondor.apana.org.au> <1234435521.28812.165.camel@penberg-laptop> <20090212105034.GC13859@gondor.apana.org.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: "Kirill A. Shutemov" , Christoph Lameter , Matt Mackall , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org, Geert.Uytterhoeven@sonycom.com To: Herbert Xu Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20090212105034.GC13859@gondor.apana.org.au> Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org List-Id: linux-crypto.vger.kernel.org On Thu, Feb 12, 2009 at 12:45:21PM +0200, Pekka Enberg wrote: > > > > Because the API was being widely abused in the nommu code, for example. > > I'd rather not add it back for this special case which can be handled > > otherwise. On Thu, 2009-02-12 at 18:50 +0800, Herbert Xu wrote: > I'm sorry but that's like banning the use of heaters just because > they can abused and cause fires. > > I think I've said this to you before but in networking we very much > want to use ksize because the standard case of a 1500-byte packet > has loads of extra room given by kmalloc which all goes to waste > right now. > > If we could use ksize then we can stuff loads of metadata in that > space. OK, fair enough, I applied Kirill's patch. Thanks. Pekka -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org