From: David Miller Subject: Re: [PATCH] Use kzfree in crypto API context initialization and key/iv handling Date: Sun, 31 May 2009 21:46:23 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <20090531.214623.76344831.davem@davemloft.net> References: <20090531025720.GC9033@oblivion.subreption.com> <20090530.230213.73434433.davem@davemloft.net> <4A22967C.3080304@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: research@subreption.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, pageexec@freemail.hu, linux-mm@kvack.org, torvalds@osdl.org, alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk, linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org, herbert@gondor.apana.org.au To: riel@redhat.com Return-path: Received: from 74-93-104-97-Washington.hfc.comcastbusiness.net ([74.93.104.97]:51211 "EHLO sunset.davemloft.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751093AbZFAEqX (ORCPT ); Mon, 1 Jun 2009 00:46:23 -0400 In-Reply-To: <4A22967C.3080304@redhat.com> Sender: linux-crypto-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: From: Rik van Riel Date: Sun, 31 May 2009 10:38:52 -0400 > David Miller wrote: >> From: "Larry H." >> Date: Sat, 30 May 2009 19:57:20 -0700 >> >>> [PATCH] Use kzfree in crypto API context initialization and key/iv >>> handling >> Thanks for not CC:ing the crypto list, and also not CC:'ing the >> crypto maintainer. >> Your submissions leave a lot to be desired, on every level. > > That's a pretty roundabout way of saying "I have no > technical objections" :) One of those "levels" was technical. I don't even want to think about what this does to IPSEC rule creation rates, that that matters heavily for cell phone networks where hundreds of thousands of nodes come in and out of the server and each such entry requires creating 4 IPSEC rules.