From: Krzysztof Halasa Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] SCRIPTS: s/should/must/ for all ERRORs Date: Thu, 11 Feb 2010 23:01:19 +0100 Message-ID: References: <1265762465-21114-1-git-send-email-richih.mailinglist@gmail.com> <20100210084908.ad315b9b.rdunlap@xenotime.net> <2d460de71002100959j49c25e37n11a8870454251d84@mail.gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Randy Dunlap , linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org, Andy Whitcroft , Andrew Morton , Daniel Walker , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org To: Richard Hartmann Return-path: Received: from khc.piap.pl ([195.187.100.11]:49894 "EHLO khc.piap.pl" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756186Ab0BKWBn (ORCPT ); Thu, 11 Feb 2010 17:01:43 -0500 In-Reply-To: <2d460de71002100959j49c25e37n11a8870454251d84@mail.gmail.com> (Richard Hartmann's message of "Wed, 10 Feb 2010 18:59:11 +0100") Sender: linux-crypto-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Richard Hartmann writes: > Personally, I feel that warnings are suggestions and errors are hard > limits, This is technically impossible - humans are much smarter than the simple checkpatch script and still every one of us was proven wrong, many times. These hard limits are not that necessary, though - a fair dose of flexibility and common sense is an advantage. -- Krzysztof Halasa