From: Richard Hartmann <richih.mailinglist@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] CRYPTO: Fix checkpatch errors & warnings in cipher.c
Date: Tue, 16 Feb 2010 12:56:15 +0100
Message-ID: <2d460de71002160356l6c26d513qba7d0cece32daddd@mail.gmail.com>
References: <1265765446-24958-1-git-send-email-richih.mailinglist@gmail.com>
	 <2d460de71002091821h7b6e99b0gb8f134355f64c65a@mail.gmail.com>
	 <20100211044604.GA12146@gondor.apana.org.au>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Cc: linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
To: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
Return-path: <linux-crypto-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from mail-bw0-f219.google.com ([209.85.218.219]:47412 "EHLO
	mail-bw0-f219.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
	with ESMTP id S1755093Ab0BPL4R (ORCPT
	<rfc822;linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org>);
	Tue, 16 Feb 2010 06:56:17 -0500
In-Reply-To: <20100211044604.GA12146@gondor.apana.org.au>
Sender: linux-crypto-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-crypto.vger.kernel.org>

On Thu, Feb 11, 2010 at 05:46, Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au> wrote:

>> Should I re-send the patch or is it less noise & hassle if I just leave
>> it this way?
>
> You don't have to resend it.

GregKH said that I should just re-send all patches after a week. OTOH, I
am not sure if this is not a little bit too agressive.

Thus, I wanted to check if I should wait some more or what the general
consensus of action in the crypto subtree is.

And yes, I am aware that janitor work, and thus my patches, is very low
priority.


Thanks,
Richard