From: Richard Hartmann Subject: Re: [PATCH 05/19] crypto: proc - Fix checkpatch errors Date: Sat, 20 Feb 2010 11:26:46 +0100 Message-ID: <2d460de71002200226w5fa27d85maa3fa75e1dca8fdd@mail.gmail.com> References: <1266538925-3245-1-git-send-email-richih.mailinglist@gmail.com> <2d460de71002190210qb9d5685n2fca0e7eff011b04@mail.gmail.com> <20100219121752.GA21682@gondor.apana.org.au> <2d460de71002190835t29c6bd6bjbee8e2f787d9ab49@mail.gmail.com> <20100220004615.GB30844@gondor.apana.org.au> <2d460de71002191759w5241431an92f48de21c9af7af@mail.gmail.com> <20100220024814.GA32053@gondor.apana.org.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Cc: "Eric W. Biederman" , linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org, "David S. Miller" , Benjamin Gilbert , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org To: Herbert Xu Return-path: Received: from mail-bw0-f209.google.com ([209.85.218.209]:64255 "EHLO mail-bw0-f209.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753004Ab0BTK0s (ORCPT ); Sat, 20 Feb 2010 05:26:48 -0500 In-Reply-To: <20100220024814.GA32053@gondor.apana.org.au> Sender: linux-crypto-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Sat, Feb 20, 2010 at 03:48, Herbert Xu wrote: >> In this case, please hold seed, tcrypt, wp512 & xcbc. I will >> refactor them. > > OK. Another workflow question: Does LKML as a whole prefer rebased patches, patches on top of the old one or does not one care as long as it's clear what to apply in what order? Or does everyone have a different opionion, in which case: What is yours? > Thanks for checking. No need to thank me. You decide what goes in and I accept that. I signed up to weworking stuff until it suits the relevant maintainer before I cloned the repo. Richard