From: Herbert Xu Subject: Re: [PATCH 05/19] crypto: proc - Fix checkpatch errors Date: Sat, 20 Feb 2010 21:12:05 +0800 Message-ID: <20100220131205.GA4948@gondor.apana.org.au> References: <1266538925-3245-1-git-send-email-richih.mailinglist@gmail.com> <2d460de71002190210qb9d5685n2fca0e7eff011b04@mail.gmail.com> <20100219121752.GA21682@gondor.apana.org.au> <2d460de71002190835t29c6bd6bjbee8e2f787d9ab49@mail.gmail.com> <20100220004615.GB30844@gondor.apana.org.au> <2d460de71002191759w5241431an92f48de21c9af7af@mail.gmail.com> <20100220024814.GA32053@gondor.apana.org.au> <2d460de71002200226w5fa27d85maa3fa75e1dca8fdd@mail.gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: "Eric W. Biederman" , linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org, "David S. Miller" , Benjamin Gilbert , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org To: Richard Hartmann Return-path: Received: from rhun.apana.org.au ([64.62.148.172]:46768 "EHLO arnor.apana.org.au" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754857Ab0BTNMW (ORCPT ); Sat, 20 Feb 2010 08:12:22 -0500 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <2d460de71002200226w5fa27d85maa3fa75e1dca8fdd@mail.gmail.com> Sender: linux-crypto-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Sat, Feb 20, 2010 at 11:26:46AM +0100, Richard Hartmann wrote: > > Another workflow question: > Does LKML as a whole prefer rebased patches, patches on top of the > old one or does not one care as long as it's clear what to apply in what > order? > Or does everyone have a different opionion, in which case: What is > yours? It depends on what you're working on. For this case in particular, sending the missing bits instead of the whole thing is my preferred solution. Cheers, -- Visit Openswan at http://www.openswan.org/ Email: Herbert Xu ~{PmV>HI~} Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/ PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt