From: Steffen Klassert Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] crypto: authenc - move saved IV in front of the ablkcipher request Date: Wed, 3 Mar 2010 07:58:40 +0100 Message-ID: <20100303065840.GE20508@secunet.com> References: <20100223062109.GD29013@secunet.com> <20100223062237.GE29013@secunet.com> <20100302141049.GB3808@gondor.apana.org.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org To: Herbert Xu Return-path: Received: from a.mx.secunet.com ([213.68.205.161]:35629 "EHLO a.mx.secunet.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754722Ab0CCG6L (ORCPT ); Wed, 3 Mar 2010 01:58:11 -0500 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20100302141049.GB3808@gondor.apana.org.au> Sender: linux-crypto-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Tue, Mar 02, 2010 at 10:10:49PM +0800, Herbert Xu wrote: > > Hmm, I just noticed that both before and after the patch we're > only including the hash request size for the encrypt case, and > not the givencrypt case. Is there a reason for this? > Hm, for the moment I don't see what's missing. The ahash request size should be the same for both cases. Do you have a hint?