From: Herbert Xu Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] RFC4106 AES-GCM Driver Using Intel New Instructions Date: Wed, 20 Oct 2010 21:02:34 +0800 Message-ID: <20101020130233.GB25827@gondor.apana.org.au> References: <4CB41CED.mailDED1NSGGA@intel.com> <20101019124908.GA12898@gondor.apana.org.au> <44813D8942D35947805CBEEA94195BB001B135B69E@irsmsx505.ger.corp.intel.com> <24483BA4C9F69C43A7379639D35543D7C2F99F27@irsmsx502.ger.corp.intel.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: "linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "Struk, Tadeusz" , "O Mahony, Aidan" , "Paoloni, Gabriele" To: "Hoban, Adrian" Return-path: Received: from helcar.apana.org.au ([209.40.204.226]:38953 "EHLO fornost.hengli.com.au" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750762Ab0JTNCg (ORCPT ); Wed, 20 Oct 2010 09:02:36 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-crypto-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Wed, Oct 20, 2010 at 11:49:10AM +0100, Hoban, Adrian wrote: > Hi Herbert, > > We have been using binutils v2.19. > > Can you please recommend the version(s) of binutils (gas) that we should test with before submitting a patch? V2.16.1, or perhaps the older version (2.12) described in /Documentation/Changes? > > We will retest with the recommended version, update the code and resubmit the patch ASAP. I was using 2.18 so if you can make it work with 2.16 I think it should be fine as it wouldn't require any of the new AES instructions. Thanks, -- Email: Herbert Xu Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/ PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt