From: Herbert Xu Subject: Re: [PATCH] crypto: padlock: fix for non-64byte aligned data Date: Tue, 7 Dec 2010 19:39:56 +0800 Message-ID: <20101207113956.GA6128@gondor.apana.org.au> References: <1288893036-31704-1-git-send-email-phil@nwl.cc> <20101104184606.GA1994@gondor.apana.org.au> <20101105141238.GG29793@orbit.nwl.cc> <20101202061441.GA22378@gondor.apana.org.au> <20101207104141.GA24946@orbit.nwl.cc> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org, Chuck Ebbert , Nico Erfurth , Harald Welte , Michal Ludvig To: Phil Sutter Return-path: Received: from helcar.apana.org.au ([209.40.204.226]:37040 "EHLO fornost.hengli.com.au" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750713Ab0LGLkE (ORCPT ); Tue, 7 Dec 2010 06:40:04 -0500 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20101207104141.GA24946@orbit.nwl.cc> Sender: linux-crypto-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Tue, Dec 07, 2010 at 11:41:41AM +0100, Phil Sutter wrote: > > Yes, CONFIG_PREEMPT is active in my test system's kernel. OK, can you see if the problem is still reproducible without preemption? Thanks, -- Email: Herbert Xu Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/ PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt