From: Harald Welte Subject: Re: [PATCH] crypto: padlock: fix for non-64byte aligned data Date: Wed, 8 Dec 2010 08:08:13 +0800 Message-ID: <20101208000813.GC10791@prithivi.gnumonks.org> References: <1288893036-31704-1-git-send-email-phil@nwl.cc> <20101104184606.GA1994@gondor.apana.org.au> <20101105141238.GG29793@orbit.nwl.cc> <20101202061441.GA22378@gondor.apana.org.au> <20101207104141.GA24946@orbit.nwl.cc> <20101207113956.GA6128@gondor.apana.org.au> <20101207134057.GB24946@orbit.nwl.cc> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Herbert Xu , linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org, Chuck Ebbert , Nico Erfurth , Michal Ludvig To: Phil Sutter Return-path: Received: from ganesha.gnumonks.org ([213.95.27.120]:49692 "EHLO ganesha.gnumonks.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751871Ab0LHAIn (ORCPT ); Tue, 7 Dec 2010 19:08:43 -0500 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20101207134057.GB24946@orbit.nwl.cc> Sender: linux-crypto-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Sorry for jumping into this thread so late. I am almost constantly on business travel (without any VIA system with me), so I cannot try to reproduce the problem. It probably has never shown up before since my typical test case is dm-crypt and there you will of course never see any unaligned buffers for encryption. I'm returning home on December 11, and hopfeully can do some testing at that time. Is there a list of machines (/proc/cpuinfo) on which the problem has shown up so far? Regards, Harald -- - Harald Welte http://linux.via.com.tw/