From: Herbert Xu Subject: Re: [RFC v2 PATCH 2/9] xfrm: Add basic infrastructure to support IPsec extended sequence numbers Date: Sun, 13 Mar 2011 14:44:57 +0800 Message-ID: <20110313064457.GB10849@gondor.apana.org.au> References: <20110308100407.GB31402@secunet.com> <20110308100543.GD31402@secunet.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: David Miller , Alex Badea , Andreas Gruenbacher , netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org To: Steffen Klassert Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20110308100543.GD31402@secunet.com> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-crypto.vger.kernel.org On Tue, Mar 08, 2011 at 11:05:43AM +0100, Steffen Klassert wrote: > This patch adds the struct xfrm_replay_state_esn which will be > used to support IPsec extended sequence numbers and anti replay windows > bigger than 32 packets. Also we add a function that returns the actual > size of the xfrm_replay_state_esn, a xfrm netlink atribute and a xfrm state > flag for the use of extended sequence numbers. > > Signed-off-by: Steffen Klassert All the remaining eight patches look good to me. Dave, how would you like to handle this patch-set? As Steffen's first crypto patch is completely self-contained, perhaps you could just include it along with the rest of the series in your tree? Thanks, -- Email: Herbert Xu Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/ PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt