From: Kim Phillips Subject: Re: [PATCH] hwrng: ppc4xx - add support for ppc4xx TRNG Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2011 11:38:36 -0500 Message-ID: <20110621113836.fbf14710.kim.phillips@freescale.com> References: <20110621121955.GB2414@zod.rchland.ibm.com> <1308671762.4954.0.camel@calx> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Josh Boyer , , Herbert Xu , To: Matt Mackall Return-path: Received: from db3ehsobe003.messaging.microsoft.com ([213.199.154.141]:32364 "EHLO DB3EHSOBE003.bigfish.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1757023Ab1FUQjC (ORCPT ); Tue, 21 Jun 2011 12:39:02 -0400 In-Reply-To: <1308671762.4954.0.camel@calx> Sender: linux-crypto-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: [adding linux-crypto] On Tue, 21 Jun 2011 10:56:02 -0500 Matt Mackall wrote: > On Tue, 2011-06-21 at 08:19 -0400, Josh Boyer wrote: > > +static struct hwrng ppc4xx_rng = { > > + .name = MODULE_NAME, > > + .data_present = ppc4xx_rng_data_present, > > + .data_read = ppc4xx_rng_data_read, > > +}; under what criteria should new hwrng drivers use the new hwrng API? See commit bb347d9 "hwrng: virtio-rng - Convert to new API". Kim