From: James Morris <jmorris@namei.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC v2.1 0/6] evm: digital signature verification extension
Date: Tue, 27 Sep 2011 09:15:32 +1000 (EST)
Message-ID: <alpine.LRH.2.00.1109270914480.4126@tundra.namei.org>
References: <cover.1315921427.git.dmitry.kasatkin@intel.com> <1316525069.3189.4.camel@localhost.localdomain> <CALLzPKbPM-7Z4UphWvZUFxT9vF8XJSWyeUGTkLaM7--2A6y7eA@mail.gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Cc: Mimi Zohar <zohar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	herbert@gondor.hengli.com.au,
	linux-crypto <linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org>,
	linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, dhowells@redhat.com,
	Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>,
	"Serge E. Hallyn" <serge.hallyn@canonical.com>
To: "Kasatkin, Dmitry" <dmitry.kasatkin@intel.com>
Return-path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
In-Reply-To: <CALLzPKbPM-7Z4UphWvZUFxT9vF8XJSWyeUGTkLaM7--2A6y7eA@mail.gmail.com>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-Id: linux-crypto.vger.kernel.org

On Mon, 26 Sep 2011, Kasatkin, Dmitry wrote:

> It seems nobody wants to share their thoughts about it?
> Does this silence mean acceptance?
> Should I prepare final patches for merge?

Not yet.

I'd like to hear what the crypto folk think about the crypto.

-- 
James Morris
<jmorris@namei.org>