From: Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for Oct 25 (crypto) Date: Sat, 29 Oct 2011 19:20:27 -0400 Message-ID: <49073.1319930427@turing-police.cc.vt.edu> References: <20111025203628.40a1b8a475e32053aa34dabe@canb.auug.org.au> <4EA75759.3050900@xenotime.net> <20111026062717.GA10230@gondor.apana.org.au> <7836.1319699116@turing-police.cc.vt.edu> <20111027074544.GA19905@gondor.apana.org.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="==_Exmh_1319930427_32791P"; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Randy Dunlap , Stephen Rothwell , linux-next@vger.kernel.org, LKML , Linus , linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org To: Herbert Xu Return-path: Received: from lennier.cc.vt.edu ([198.82.162.213]:45999 "EHLO lennier.cc.vt.edu" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755335Ab1J2XVz (ORCPT ); Sat, 29 Oct 2011 19:21:55 -0400 In-Reply-To: Your message of "Thu, 27 Oct 2011 09:45:44 +0200." <20111027074544.GA19905@gondor.apana.org.au> Sender: linux-crypto-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: --==_Exmh_1319930427_32791P Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii On Thu, 27 Oct 2011 09:45:44 +0200, Herbert Xu said: > On Thu, Oct 27, 2011 at 03:05:16AM -0400, Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu wrote: > > Are there any use cases where a config (probably embedded) would wantq > > CRYPTO_USER but not CRYPTO_NET? Would seem a shame to pull in the entire > > Since the CRYPTO_USER interface sits on top of netlink I don't > see how you could possibly avoid NET. Oh, OK. The original bug report looked like just some utility functions not defined, so I didn't pick up on the "it needs netlink" aspect of it. --==_Exmh_1319930427_32791P Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Exmh version 2.5 07/13/2001 iD8DBQFOrIo7cC3lWbTT17ARAqLTAJ4tO11YTXGnzUPMNF9qFITPhJwAvACgmV/x UnTxPqqbZqAARe095NBobOc= =XJkt -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --==_Exmh_1319930427_32791P--