From: James Morris Subject: Re: [Keyrings] [RFC][PATCH 00/16] Crypto keys and module signing [ver #2] Date: Tue, 6 Dec 2011 11:54:47 +1100 (EST) Message-ID: References: <4EDCABBD.9020401@intel.com> <20111129234258.13625.21153.stgit@warthog.procyon.org.uk> <776.1323085419@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" , keyrings@linux-nfs.org, alan.cox@intel.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org, dmitry.kasatkin@intel.com, linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org, arjan.van.de.ven@intel.com, Herbert Xu To: David Howells Return-path: Received: from tundra.namei.org ([65.99.196.166]:42166 "EHLO tundra.namei.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756348Ab1LFAy7 (ORCPT ); Mon, 5 Dec 2011 19:54:59 -0500 In-Reply-To: <776.1323085419@redhat.com> Sender: linux-crypto-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Mon, 5 Dec 2011, David Howells wrote: > However, we don't have to include the DSA stuff in the kernel; I can always > discard that patch from the upstream-aimed patchset. I'd encourage dropping DSA, as there appears to be no legacy justification for its inclusion. - James -- James Morris