From: omara <omarapazanadi@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: I have a Question about linux asynchronous crypto
Date: Sun, 01 Jan 2012 12:46:14 +0800
Message-ID: <4EFFE516.8060203@gmail.com>
References: <4EFEE23D.7070602@gmail.com> <alpine.LRH.2.02.1112311013340.31442@well.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8;
	format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE
Cc: linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org
To: Mark Allyn <allyn@well.com>
Return-path: <linux-crypto-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from mail-iy0-f174.google.com ([209.85.210.174]:55026 "EHLO
	mail-iy0-f174.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
	with ESMTP id S1750990Ab2AAEqS (ORCPT
	<rfc822;linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org>);
	Sat, 31 Dec 2011 23:46:18 -0500
Received: by iaeh11 with SMTP id h11so27580307iae.19
        for <linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org>; Sat, 31 Dec 2011 20:46:18 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LRH.2.02.1112311013340.31442@well.com>
Sender: linux-crypto-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-crypto.vger.kernel.org>

=E4=BA=8E 12-1-1 =E4=B8=8A=E5=8D=882:13, Mark Allyn =E5=86=99=E9=81=93:
>
> As far as I can see, I agree. The generic implementations all seem to
> be synchronous.
>

Thanks Allyn,I got it,happy new year to you.