From: Herbert Xu Subject: Re: sha-512... Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2012 15:01:28 +1100 Message-ID: <20120215040128.GA8738@gondor.apana.org.au> References: <20120214.225833.303014660389989764.davem@davemloft.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org To: David Miller Return-path: Received: from helcar.apana.org.au ([209.40.204.226]:35846 "EHLO fornost.hengli.com.au" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752509Ab2BOEBa (ORCPT ); Tue, 14 Feb 2012 23:01:30 -0500 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20120214.225833.303014660389989764.davem@davemloft.net> Sender: linux-crypto-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 10:58:33PM -0500, David Miller wrote: > > FYI, I just started seeing this on sparc32 after all those > sha512 "optimizations": > > crypto/sha512_generic.c: In function 'sha512_transform': > crypto/sha512_generic.c:135:1: warning: the frame size of 1136 bytes is larger than 1024 bytes [-Wframe-larger-than=] Is that with the latest patch applied? crypto: sha512 - Avoid stack bloat on i386 If so then this is not good. What was the original stack usage, i.e., if you revert to the original percpu code? Thanks, -- Email: Herbert Xu Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/ PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt