From: Steffen Klassert Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] crypto: user - Fix size of netlink dump message Date: Thu, 29 Mar 2012 07:53:30 +0200 Message-ID: <20120329055330.GB1021@secunet.com> References: <20120326072729.GA16191@secunet.com> <20120326072827.GB16191@secunet.com> <20120329054504.GA1021@secunet.com> <20120329054626.GA16593@gondor.apana.org.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org To: Herbert Xu Return-path: Received: from a.mx.secunet.com ([195.81.216.161]:33827 "EHLO a.mx.secunet.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753077Ab2C2Fxd (ORCPT ); Thu, 29 Mar 2012 01:53:33 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20120329054626.GA16593@gondor.apana.org.au> Sender: linux-crypto-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Thu, Mar 29, 2012 at 01:46:26PM +0800, Herbert Xu wrote: > On Thu, Mar 29, 2012 at 07:45:04AM +0200, Steffen Klassert wrote: > > On Mon, Mar 26, 2012 at 09:28:27AM +0200, Steffen Klassert wrote: > > > + > > > return netlink_dump_start(crypto_nlsk, skb, nlh, > > > - link->dump, link->done, 0); > > > + link->dump, link->done, dump_alloc); > > > > I've just noticed that the interface to netlink_dump_start() changed in > > the mainline (with commit 80d326fab534a5380e8f6e509a0b9076655a9670), so > > this will cause a conflict. The crypto-2.6 tree is way behind the mainline > > (v3.2 + some patches). Could you please update the crypto-2.6 tree so that > > I can respin this patch? > > > As long as your patch is against mainline it should be fine. I will > rebase cryptodev before applying any patches for the next release. > Ok, so I'll respin this one to the mainline and resend. Anyway, would be nice to see this fix in v3.4.