From: Tabi Timur-B04825 Subject: Re: [linuxppc-release] [PATCH v3 4/4] fsl-dma: use spin_lock_bh to instead of spin_lock_irqsave Date: Mon, 16 Jul 2012 14:25:18 +0000 Message-ID: <5004244D.4000106@freescale.com> References: <1342411780-29930-1-git-send-email-qiang.liu@freescale.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT Cc: "linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org" , "linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org" , Vinod Koul , "herbert@gondor.hengli.com.au" , Dan Williams , Li Yang-R58472 , "davem@davemloft.net" To: Liu Qiang-B32616 Return-path: Received: from ch1ehsobe005.messaging.microsoft.com ([216.32.181.185]:49484 "EHLO ch1outboundpool.messaging.microsoft.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752678Ab2GPOZY convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Mon, 16 Jul 2012 10:25:24 -0400 In-Reply-To: <1342411780-29930-1-git-send-email-qiang.liu@freescale.com> Content-Language: en-US Content-ID: <5765241592447A4E9A74A072F8F14E81@mgd.freescale.com> Sender: linux-crypto-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Qiang Liu wrote: > Use spin_lock_bh to instead of spin_lock_irqsave for improving performance. You forgot to include the evidence that performance has improved, as well as an explanation why it's okay to use spin_lock_bh, and why it's faster. I told you to respin the patch with that information in the patch description. -- Timur Tabi Linux kernel developer at Freescale