From: Rusty Russell Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] Asymmetric keys and module signing Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2012 16:24:06 +0930 Message-ID: <87d3163aep.fsf@rustcorp.com.au> References: <5555.1348531649@warthog.procyon.org.uk> <87ehlp30pd.fsf@rustcorp.com.au> <1348711443.17807.12.camel@falcor> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: David Howells , herbert@gondor.hengli.com.au, pjones@redhat.com, jwboyer@redhat.com, linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org, linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, keyrings@linux-nfs.org To: Mimi Zohar Return-path: Received: from ozlabs.org ([203.10.76.45]:60804 "EHLO ozlabs.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751340Ab2I1GzM (ORCPT ); Fri, 28 Sep 2012 02:55:12 -0400 In-Reply-To: <1348711443.17807.12.camel@falcor> Sender: linux-crypto-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Mimi Zohar writes: > On Wed, 2012-09-26 at 13:16 +0930, Rusty Russell wrote: >> David Howells writes: >> > The module signing patches provide: >> > >> > - Some fixes to Rusty's patch. Also an additional patch to extend the policy >> > handling for modules signed with an unknown key and to handle FIPS mode. >> >> Ok, I merged some of this (after our previous accidentally-off-list >> discussion). > > Rusty, have you pushed this branch out yet? > > thanks, > > Mimi git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/rusty/linux.git modules-next (That's *not* where linux-next currently pulls from) Cheers, Rusty.