From: David Howells Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] Asymmetric keys and module signing Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2012 09:00:27 +0100 Message-ID: <27146.1348819227@warthog.procyon.org.uk> References: <5555.1348531649@warthog.procyon.org.uk> <87ehlp30pd.fsf@rustcorp.com.au> Cc: dhowells@redhat.com, Rusty Russell , herbert@gondor.hengli.com.au, pjones@redhat.com, jwboyer@redhat.com, linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org, linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, keyrings@linux-nfs.org To: Geert Uytterhoeven Return-path: Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:13251 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752619Ab2I1IAl (ORCPT ); Fri, 28 Sep 2012 04:00:41 -0400 In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-crypto-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > Just wondering, what's the advantage of doing panic over just > rejecting the module? > Panic is a DoS? FIPS mode is strange like that. David