From: Fabio Estevam Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] crypto: sahara: Add support for SAHARA in i.MX27. Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2013 13:47:23 -0300 Message-ID: References: <1361449162-27302-1-git-send-email-javier.martin@vista-silicon.com> <201302211259.26763.arnd@arndb.de> <201302211440.59577.arnd@arndb.de> <20130221152310.GA1906@pengutronix.de> <87ehg9k4cm.fsf@lebrac.rtp-net.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Cc: Sascha Hauer , gcembed@gmail.com, swarren@nvidia.com, herbert@gondor.apana.org.au, Arnd Bergmann , tony@atomide.com, javier Martin , kernel@pengutronix.de, shawn.guo@linaro.org, davem@davemloft.net, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org To: Arnaud Patard Return-path: Received: from mail-wi0-f182.google.com ([209.85.212.182]:50412 "EHLO mail-wi0-f182.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755732Ab3BUQrY (ORCPT ); Thu, 21 Feb 2013 11:47:24 -0500 Received: by mail-wi0-f182.google.com with SMTP id hi18so7837697wib.9 for ; Thu, 21 Feb 2013 08:47:23 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <87ehg9k4cm.fsf@lebrac.rtp-net.org> Sender: linux-crypto-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Thu, Feb 21, 2013 at 1:40 PM, Arnaud Patard wrote: > How different are the variants ? I've a imx51 device with DT support so > if someone running sahara on a system with DT is needed, I can be this > person (as long as a way to test it is provided too). mx27 has Saharav2, mx51 has Saharav4. I didn't check the differences in detail though. For mx51 the Sahara block is described in the document "MCIMX51 Applications Processor Security Reference Manual, Rev. 1" I can also test the sahara dt support on a mx27pdk.