From: Arnaud Patard (Rtp) Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] crypto: sahara: Add support for SAHARA in i.MX27. Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2013 21:59:29 +0100 Message-ID: <87a9qxjscu.fsf@lebrac.rtp-net.org> References: <1361449162-27302-1-git-send-email-javier.martin@vista-silicon.com> <201302211259.26763.arnd@arndb.de> <201302211440.59577.arnd@arndb.de> <20130221152310.GA1906@pengutronix.de> <87ehg9k4cm.fsf@lebrac.rtp-net.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Sascha Hauer , gcembed@gmail.com, swarren@nvidia.com, herbert@gondor.apana.org.au, Arnd Bergmann , tony@atomide.com, javier Martin , kernel@pengutronix.de, shawn.guo@linaro.org, davem@davemloft.net, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org To: Fabio Estevam Return-path: Received: from lebrac.rtp-net.org ([88.191.135.105]:47667 "EHLO lebrac.rtp-net.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753709Ab3BUVBY (ORCPT ); Thu, 21 Feb 2013 16:01:24 -0500 In-Reply-To: (Fabio Estevam's message of "Thu, 21 Feb 2013 13:47:23 -0300") Sender: linux-crypto-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Fabio Estevam writes: Hi, > On Thu, Feb 21, 2013 at 1:40 PM, Arnaud Patard > wrote: > >> How different are the variants ? I've a imx51 device with DT support so >> if someone running sahara on a system with DT is needed, I can be this >> person (as long as a way to test it is provided too). > > mx27 has Saharav2, mx51 has Saharav4. I didn't check the differences > in detail though. > > For mx51 the Sahara block is described in the document "MCIMX51 > Applications Processor Security Reference Manual, Rev. 1" Sorry but this document is not freely available so I can't look at it. Arnaud