From: Herbert Xu Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] i.MX27: Add clock support for SAHARA2. Date: Sun, 10 Mar 2013 16:34:01 +0800 Message-ID: <20130310083401.GB10448@gondor.apana.org.au> References: <1362137873-8827-1-git-send-email-javier.martin@vista-silicon.com> <1362137873-8827-2-git-send-email-javier.martin@vista-silicon.com> <20130304075306.GA1906@pengutronix.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Sascha Hauer , linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org, davem@davemloft.net, kernel@pengutronix.de, gcembed@gmail.com, shawn.guo@linaro.org, arnd@arndb.de, swarren@nvidia.com To: javier Martin Return-path: Received: from sting.hengli.com.au ([178.18.18.71]:59197 "EHLO fornost.hengli.com.au" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752305Ab3CJIeX (ORCPT ); Sun, 10 Mar 2013 04:34:23 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-crypto-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Tue, Mar 05, 2013 at 08:48:19AM +0100, javier Martin wrote: > Hi Sascha, > > On 4 March 2013 08:53, Sascha Hauer wrote: > > On Fri, Mar 01, 2013 at 12:37:52PM +0100, Javier Martin wrote: > >> > >> Signed-off-by: Javier Martin > >> --- > >> arch/arm/mach-imx/clk-imx27.c | 2 ++ > >> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+) > >> > >> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-imx/clk-imx27.c b/arch/arm/mach-imx/clk-imx27.c > >> index 4c1d1e4..0b9664a 100644 > >> --- a/arch/arm/mach-imx/clk-imx27.c > >> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-imx/clk-imx27.c > >> @@ -253,6 +253,8 @@ int __init mx27_clocks_init(unsigned long fref) > >> clk_register_clkdev(clk[nfc_baud_gate], NULL, "imx27-nand.0"); > >> clk_register_clkdev(clk[vpu_baud_gate], "per", "coda-imx27.0"); > >> clk_register_clkdev(clk[vpu_ahb_gate], "ahb", "coda-imx27.0"); > >> + clk_register_clkdev(clk[sahara_ahb_gate], "ahb", "sahara-imx27.0"); > >> + clk_register_clkdev(clk[sahara_ipg_gate], "ipg", "sahara-imx27.0"); > > > > One of the first patches I want to push upstream for the next merge > > window is this one: > > > > https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/1817741/ > > > > So the change above becomes unnecessary > > Very good. Then this patch can be safely dropped. So should I take this patch or not? Thanks, -- Email: Herbert Xu Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/ PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt